From: alickletuchofarryinnernight@hjghjgh.com   
      
   "Paul Stables"  wrote in message   
   news:40ce3f77$1_2@rain.i-cable.com...   
   >   
      
   > >   
   > We haven't fallen out. I was trying to advance the argument that a piece   
   of   
   > writing should be evaluated on its own merits without regard to the   
   > character of the person who wrote it. I was using Waugh as an example   
   > because I know he is one of your favourite writers even though you dislike   
   > many elements of his character and politics. However, as you point out   
   there   
   > is a world of difference between Waugh's writing and the trolling   
   article -   
   > so on reflection I think I had better quit this thread. Don't worry I am   
   not   
   > going to quit this news group and I am touched, Robbie, touched, by your   
   > encouraging words.   
   >   
   > Paul Stables   
      
      
   That's quite all right me old steeplechaser. The Waugh axiom is pretty   
   reliable- I mean look at the amount of opprobrium some Orwell's personal   
   habits and views must cause Martha Bridegam.   
      
      
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)