From: lips@pips.com   
      
   "Sam Nelson"  wrote in message   
   news:dnrlcl$r87$1@dulnain.stir.ac.uk...   
   > In article ,   
   >  "JAZZ LIPS"  writes:   
   > > "Shazam"  wrote in message   
   > > news:439ff330$0$90288$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...   
   > > > on something called XM satellite radio   
   > > >   
   > > > would suit me as a replacement for home truths   
   > >   
   > > Christ, the media lionizing of this old mountebanke is out of control.   
   >   
   > Would you consider him a hegenomic rechauffiste mountebank?   
      
      
   He is one of the greatest rechauffistes in rock and roll history -  Don't   
   get me wrong I really like his records - well, some of them.   
   He's not part of the hegenomic debate because Dylan is basically a   
   reactionary that never got found out; however HD-ers are usually Dylan fans   
   and assume he is one. But mountebank/charlatan - definitely. See the fake   
   bike crash in '66. The interesting thing about Dylan is that he did his best   
   work when he was a total charlatan. The more real he got the worse the   
   records have become - see any record of his from the last 35 years - though   
   Love and Theft was a wonderful late burst. If only the Stones could redeem   
   themselves like that.   
      
   The real Dylan can be glimpsed in the vinegary parts of the songs IMO -   
   Idiot Wind for example is a wonderful record.   
      
   ROBBIE   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)