From: word_chemist@hotmail.com
"Martha Bridegam" wrote in message
news:jzpJf.30412$Jd.15376@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> >
>
> You don't think greater economic fairness would reduce the
> popularity of religious excess?
Not in the slightest. Some points:
1 Osama Bin Laden and his upper echelon colleagues are all upper-middle
class playboys who decided to become intensely conservative.
2 The Muslims who will kill the next batch of Londoners will be second
generation people who have never been poverty struck and who have been the
beneficiaries of greater economic fairness - much greater - simply by their
parents wanting to escape the serfdom of the Islamic world and make it big
here. Their children, rather like certian choleric Boston Irishmen, get
certain romantic ideas and - via the koran - a furious desire to punish the
debaucheries of the West. (I'm often tempted to ask the many Muslim
tobacconists I encounter their views about paying for their Mercedez-Benzes
with money made from selling alcohol and pornography - my old man maintains
that porn did not arrive in suburban tobacconists until the Indians and
Pakistanis cornered the market in them. AND BEFORE YOU think ill of my old
man I might add that he was - like most Englishmen - a natural
multiculturalist until the Left made it compulsory and declared its
intention of dismantling his country and culture - even the Germans couldn't
do that, not even with the V2 rocket that blew his house to pieces in
Peckham in 1944 (while he and his mother crouched in a Morrison shelter
*inside*) but sure enough, the Left got stuck in, and are slowly and surely
finishing the job off.
3) The 7th July terrorists were not from poverty. One of them left an
enormous sum in his will.
Marx sneered at Christianity, but Islam would have given him the night
sweats.
ROBBIE
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
