From: word_chemist@hotmail.com   
      
   "Martha Bridegam"  wrote in message   
   news:cOJNf.36490$Jd.22527@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...   
   > selene1022 wrote:   
   > > Maybe this will help Martha....   
   >   
   > You're all so solicitous for my immortal soul, it's quite   
   > affecting.   
   >   
   > Apparently you haven't quite understood me.   
   >   
   > I oppose the same horrors you so enjoy listing   
      
   De haut en bas. Lurking behind that is probably a little mental chess move   
   which says: 'these people are so unseemly - they can't be right because they   
   have a *pornographic* interest in bla bla bla'...   
      
      
   . Of course I   
   > do, and you know I do, and I know you do. (We're a very   
   > knowledgeable newsgroup.) It's just that the civilized way   
   > to answer such atrocities is by opposing fundamentalist   
   > zealotry in general   
      
   You see that's where you reveal that I have 'quite understood' you. Your   
   dogma prevents you from publicly making the only rational conclusions   
   available - so you hide behind platitudinous generalisation. It's an   
   abdication of reason.   
      
   ROBBIE   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)