Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.books.george-orwell    |    Discussing 1984, sadly coming true...    |    4,149 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,551 of 4,149    |
|    Walter Traprock to All    |
|    from Queer Books: British Support for hu    |
|    29 Jan 07 22:27:26    |
      From: wetraprock@hotmail.com              If one seeks for a better excuse than mere entertainment, if the       book buyer asks for a solid and serious reason for the Notable       Trials in this country, I think it can be found with ease. Here       is a history of criminal procedure in the country which has made       the most progress in the field. It is offered to the citizens of       this country, where criminal justice is a scandal. It is not a       record of cruelty and ruthlessness, but of a swift and fairly sure       disposition in each case, tempered by mercy when that was indicated.              Thus, an innocent man, Abraham Thornton, even a century ago, was       protected by the law against public clamour. A lunatic, Ronald       True, was sent where he belonged. A doubtful sentence, on Mrs.       Maybrick, was, at any rate, commuted to a lesser penalty; while the       deliberate murderers, Neill Cream and G. J. Smith, were promptly       obliterated by the hangman instead of being saved alive for release       by some foolish executive.              As this last remark will be considered savage by those who hearts       are grieved at the thought that anything whatever should be done       to a murderer, no matter how dangerous, it may be useful to say       that the modern, enlightened and humane school of criminologists       had been permitted to experiment with Neill Cream. He had been       once before convicted of a cruel murder, and was given merely a       life sentence. This was in Illinois.              While in prison he came into a fortune, by the death of his father,       and there was started an agitation for his release so that he might       enjoy his money. Nobody opposed his pardon, as far as I know; it       is never anybody's business to oppose turning criminals loose again.       If anybody does oppose it, he is disposed of by the modern, enlightened       and humane school of criminologists: they call him a sadist, and       that is good enough argument for them. Everybody who does not       believe that murderers should roam the earth at their own sweet       will is a "sadist," delighting in torture.              So Neill Cream was released from prison, and he justified the       theories of the tender-hearted by going to London and murdering       four wretched women -- murdering them in a manner which caused them       to suffer racking torments before they died.              The Governor of Illinois who pardoned him is still alive, I believe.       I have often wondered how he feels about it.              Those who believe in the retention of capital punishment cannot       denounce all its opponents as sentimentalists, since there is a       strong case against it. But neither can the opponents of the death       penalty say that it does not deter murderers, until we, in this       country, put it into practice. As long as we execute only four       murderers out of 262 (as in New York in 1923) we cannot say that       it does not deter, for we do not know.              And as long as England and Canada execute their murderers, and keep       the murder rate so low, it is folly to say that murderers do not       fear the death penalty. The argument about capital punishment is       of minor importance compared with the need of an attitude of mind       which seeks to protect the future victims of crime, rather than       weep so much over the fate of convicted murderers.              If the death penalty is abolished, the same folk who are so sorry       for murderers, whose great hearts throb so violently when a man       like the bandit and murderer Gerald Chapman is put to death, will       be found agitating just as tearfully against the life sentence.       The same sentimental lawyers will make the same silly appeals to       juries, and the same signers of petitions will be trying to get       lifers out of jail in a few years. They procured the release of       Neill Cream with the result I have described. They have never       ceased to try to get out of prison the child torturer and muderer,       Jesse Pomeroy -- the familiar appeal was made recently, on the       ground that he had "learned Arabic in prison" and would be a "valuable       member of the community."              -- from Queer Books, by Edmond Pearson, pages 249-251              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca