home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.books.george-orwell      Discussing 1984, sadly coming true...      4,149 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,818 of 4,149   
   dank to All   
   Re: Why England Has to Get Out of the EU   
   04 Mar 08 18:55:58   
   
   953c5504   
   XPost: soc.culture.british   
   From: dank@nugget.org   
      
   generalconyers@googlemail.com wrote...   
   > 'Britain's efforts to deport terrorist suspects including the radical   
   > Muslim cleric Abu Qatada were dealt a serious blow by the European   
   > Court of Human Rights yesterday.   
   >   
   > In a unanimous decision, the court in Strasbourg ruled against an   
   > attempt by Italy to return a Tunisian to his home country. The Italian   
   > authorities had sought to have Nassim Saadi deported on the ground   
   > that he had played an "active role" in an organisation providing   
   > support to fundamentalist Islamist cells in Italy and abroad.   
   >   
   > The 17 judges decided that sending Saadi back would violate the   
   > European Convention on Human Rights because he faced a real risk of   
   > torture or inhumane treatment. Britain, which is seeking to send Abu   
   > Qatada to Jordan, had intervened in the case in the hope that the   
   > court would back the return of suspects regardless of their home   
   > country's human rights record.   
      
   Wouldn't playing an "active role" in a terrorist-related organization   
   constitute a crime that he could be convicted and imprisoned for?  If   
   he really is a threat then it would be better to lock him up than to   
   deport him to some crackpot izlamoid country where he will continue to   
   plot and scheme against the infidel British.   
      
      
   > Ministers argued that the right of the British public to be protected   
   > against terrorism should be balanced against suspects' right not to be   
   > illtreated on their return home. But the court rejected the   
   > Government's argument and ruled that the protection against torture is   
   > absolute.   
      
   The problem is that letting him live in Britain constitutes a sort of   
   torture, a nanny state with rotten food and surveillance cameras that   
   watch you go poo.   
      
      
      
      
   >   
   > The judgment, from which there is no appeal...'   
   >   
   > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3455996.ece   
   >   
   > Now which fucking hippy/socialist/denouncer of racists here fails to   
   > see ironies?...   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca