From: tsm@fastmail.ca   
      
   dart200  wrote:   
   > On 1/7/26 6:27 PM, Tara wrote:   
   >> dart200  wrote:   
   >>> On 1/7/26 11:24 AM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>> On 1/7/2026 10:55 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>> On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 10:27:51 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 1/6/2026 6:55 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 1/6/26 6:53 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 1/6/26 10:21 AM, Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> It was the Viking, Eric the Red who, in AD 986, first saw   
   Greenland’s   
   >>>>>>>>> potential. He wanted to colonise his newly-discovered island, and in   
   >>>>>>>>> a blatant piece of tenth-century spin-doctoring hit on a wizard   
   >>>>>>>>> wheeze to encourage other Norse people to come to this bleak, icy and   
   >>>>>>>>> remote corner of the unknown world:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> ‘In the summer, Erik left to settle in the country he had found,   
   >>>>>>>>> which he called Greenland, as he said people would be attracted there   
   >>>>>>>>> if it had a favourable name.‘   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> More than a thousand years later, US president Donald Trump is   
   >>>>>>>>> proposing something similar.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> ‘It’s a large real estate deal. Owning Greenland is vital for US   
   >>>>>>>>> security… and economic security… It’s an absolute necessity   
   and I   
   >>>>>>>>> cannot assure you that we would not use military or economic   
   >>>>>>>>> coercion.‘   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> That may sound outlandish. But Trump’s ambition isn’t new.   
   America   
   >>>>>>>>> has controlled Greenland before: during the Second World War, it   
   >>>>>>>>> became a de facto US protectorate. The US has also previously sought   
   >>>>>>>>> to buy Greenland; in 1946, it offered $100 million in gold bullion;   
   >>>>>>>>> around $7 billion in today’s money.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> For now, Greenland belongs to Denmark. But Denmark’s ownership of   
   >>>>>>>>> Greenland is itself a piece of bare-faced colonialism, as a glance at   
   >>>>>>>>> their policy of forced assimilation in the 1940s and 50s makes clear.   
   >>>>>>>>> As a result, the Danes are much resented by most Greenlanders.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Greenland has been moving towards independence almost as long as it   
   >>>>>>>>> has been a colony of Denmark. They were granted Home Rule in 1979.   
   >>>>>>>>> This was expanded to full self-rule with the 2009 Self-Government Act   
   >>>>>>>>> – legislation that also handed Greenland the right to declare   
   >>>>>>>>> independence. Today, Denmark retains control only of defence, foreign   
   >>>>>>>>> affairs, and monetary policy. The 2023 Greenlandic constitution   
   >>>>>>>>> explicitly commits the island to independence; and in his 2025 New   
   >>>>>>>>> Year speech, Greenland’s prime minister, Múte Egede, called for an   
   >>>>>>>>> end to ‘the shackles of colonialism’ and a future shaped by   
   >>>>>>>>> Greenlanders themselves.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> The final umbilical cord linking Greenland to Denmark is the annual   
   >>>>>>>>> block grant of 3.9 billion kroner (roughly £410 million), making up   
   >>>>>>>>> about 19 per cent of Greenland’s GDP. But to put that in   
   perspective,   
   >>>>>>>>> it is less than the amount annually spent by the US on the city of El   
   >>>>>>>>> Paso, Texas. And it is minuscule compared to the mineral wealth   
   >>>>>>>>> Greenland could one day command in partnership with a deep-pocketed   
   >>>>>>>>> ally, of whom there are at least three: America, China and Russia.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> China, in particular, has shown intense interest. At one point,   
   >>>>>>>>> Beijing proposed a $2.5 billion (£1.8 billion) investment in a   
   >>>>>>>>> Greenlandic mine (more than the island’s entire GDP), which would   
   >>>>>>>>> have brought in 5,000 Chinese workers. Then they proposed massive   
   >>>>>>>>> infrastructure investments, including a deep-sea port and two   
   >>>>>>>>> international airports. These would require capital which would leave   
   >>>>>>>>> Greenland beholden for all time. Denmark and the US, unsurprisingly,   
   >>>>>>>>> blocked these plans.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> So why are the great powers so keen to own Greenland? Natural   
   >>>>>>>>> resources are a big reason why. The great powers’ unashamed lust   
   for   
   >>>>>>>>> Greenland’s rare earths is but one element of a global race to   
   >>>>>>>>> control the production of the strategic minerals which are essential   
   >>>>>>>>> components of batteries, phones, electric vehicles and all modern   
   >>>>>>>>> computing devices. It’s about silicon, germanium, phosphorus,   
   boron,   
   >>>>>>>>> indium phosphide, gallium, graphite, uranium, copper, lithium, cobalt   
   >>>>>>>>> and nickel, among others. He who controls their production holds the   
   >>>>>>>>> key to the digital globe.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Odd as it may sound, it’s also about Taiwan. Taiwan manufactures   
   over   
   >>>>>>>>> 60 per cent of the world’s semiconductors and more than 90 per cent   
   >>>>>>>>> of its most advanced chips. If China were ever to carry out its   
   >>>>>>>>> threat to invade Taiwan (which some observers think may be imminent,   
   >>>>>>>>> perhaps encouraged by Donald Trump’s daring raid on Venezuela), it   
   >>>>>>>>> would gain near-total control of the global microchip supply. Do we   
   >>>>>>>>> really want to be dependent on China for every phone, computer and   
   >>>>>>>>> electric vehicle produced in the West?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> The US needs to develop chip-making capabilities comparable to   
   >>>>>>>>> Taiwan’s. To achieve this it needs reliable sources for the 50 or   
   so   
   >>>>>>>>> critical minerals required. And Greenland holds concentrated   
   >>>>>>>>> quantities of 30 of them, amounting to a considerable chunk of the   
   >>>>>>>>> world’s total rare earth reserves. But the reality is that with a   
   >>>>>>>>> population of just 57,000 – many of them Inuit fishermen and   
   hunters   
   >>>>>>>>> – Greenland lacks the industrial infrastructure to extract these   
   >>>>>>>>> minerals. Both China and the US would be keen to fill that gap.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Another great attraction of Greenland is its strategic position. As   
   >>>>>>>>> the ice melts – at a rate of as much as 270 billion tonnes per   
   year –   
   >>>>>>>>> several strategic sea routes are being opened up. The world is waking   
   >>>>>>>>> up to the potential strategic value of Greenland, the largest non-   
   >>>>>>>>> continental island on Earth. Greenland controls the top end of the   
   >>>>>>>>> Greenland–Iceland–UK Gap. This area is crucial to Nato submarine   
   >>>>>>>>> surveillance and was vital in resupplying Europe during WWII. It also   
   >>>>>>>>> hosts the Thule Air Base (now renamed Pituffik Space Base), an   
   >>>>>>>>> essential part of US air defence and missile early warning systems.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)