home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.buddha.short.fat.guy      Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism      155,846 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 154,014 of 155,846   
   Noah Sombrero to user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
   Re: Why would anyone want to rule Greenl   
   08 Jan 26 08:58:04   
   
   From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 22:40:13 -0800, dart200   
    wrote:   
      
   >On 1/7/26 10:14 PM, Tara wrote:   
   >> dart200  wrote:   
   >>> On 1/7/26 8:41 PM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>> Tara  wrote:   
   >>>>> dart200  wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 1/7/26 6:49 PM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>> dart200  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 1/7/26 6:27 PM, Tara wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> dart200  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 1/7/26 11:24 AM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 1/7/2026 10:55 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 10:27:51 -0800, Dude    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/2026 6:55 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/26 6:53 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/26 10:21 AM, Julian wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was the Viking, Eric the Red who, in AD 986, first saw   
   Greenland’s   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> potential. He wanted to colonise his newly-discovered island,   
   and in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a blatant piece of tenth-century spin-doctoring hit on a   
   wizard   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wheeze to encourage other Norse people to come to this bleak,   
   icy and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remote corner of the unknown world:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘In the summer, Erik left to settle in the country he had   
   found,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which he called Greenland, as he said people would be   
   attracted there   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it had a favourable name.‘   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More than a thousand years later, US president Donald Trump is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposing something similar.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘It’s a large real estate deal. Owning Greenland is vital for   
   US   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> security… and economic security… It’s an absolute necessity   
   and I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot assure you that we would not use military or economic   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coercion.‘   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That may sound outlandish. But Trump’s ambition isn’t new.   
   America   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has controlled Greenland before: during the Second World War,   
   it   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> became a de facto US protectorate. The US has also previously   
   sought   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to buy Greenland; in 1946, it offered $100 million in gold   
   bullion;   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around $7 billion in today’s money.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now, Greenland belongs to Denmark. But Denmark’s   
   ownership of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greenland is itself a piece of bare-faced colonialism, as a   
   glance at   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their policy of forced assimilation in the 1940s and 50s   
   makes clear.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As a result, the Danes are much resented by most Greenlanders.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greenland has been moving towards independence almost as long   
   as it   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been a colony of Denmark. They were granted Home Rule in   
   1979.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This was expanded to full self-rule with the 2009   
   Self-Government Act   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> – legislation that also handed Greenland the right to declare   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> independence. Today, Denmark retains control only of defence,   
   foreign   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affairs, and monetary policy. The 2023 Greenlandic   
   constitution   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explicitly commits the island to independence; and in his   
   2025 New   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Year speech, Greenland’s prime minister, Múte Egede, called   
   for an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end to ‘the shackles of colonialism’ and a future shaped by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greenlanders themselves.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The final umbilical cord linking Greenland to Denmark is the   
   annual   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> block grant of 3.9 billion kroner (roughly £410 million),   
   making up   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about 19 per cent of Greenland’s GDP. But to put that in   
   perspective,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is less than the amount annually spent by the US on the   
   city of El   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paso, Texas. And it is minuscule compared to the mineral   
   wealth   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greenland could one day command in partnership with a   
   deep-pocketed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ally, of whom there are at least three: America, China and   
   Russia.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> China, in particular, has shown intense interest. At one   
   point,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Beijing proposed a $2.5 billion (£1.8 billion) investment in a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greenlandic mine (more than the island’s entire GDP), which   
   would   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have brought in 5,000 Chinese workers. Then they proposed   
   massive   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infrastructure investments, including a deep-sea port and two   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> international airports. These would require capital which   
   would leave   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greenland beholden for all time. Denmark and the US,   
   unsurprisingly,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked these plans.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So why are the great powers so keen to own Greenland? Natural   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resources are a big reason why. The great powers’ unashamed   
   lust for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Greenland’s rare earths is but one element of a global race to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control the production of the strategic minerals which are   
   essential   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> components of batteries, phones, electric vehicles and all   
   modern   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> computing devices. It’s about silicon, germanium, phosphorus,   
   boron,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indium phosphide, gallium, graphite, uranium, copper,   
   lithium, cobalt   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and nickel, among others. He who controls their production   
   holds the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key to the digital globe.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Odd as it may sound, it’s also about Taiwan. Taiwan   
   manufactures over   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 60 per cent of the world’s semiconductors and more than 90   
   per cent   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of its most advanced chips. If China were ever to carry out   
   its   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat to invade Taiwan (which some observers think may be   
   imminent,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perhaps encouraged by Donald Trump’s daring raid on   
   Venezuela), it   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would gain near-total control of the global microchip supply.   
   Do we   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really want to be dependent on China for every phone,   
   computer and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> electric vehicle produced in the West?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The US needs to develop chip-making capabilities comparable to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taiwan’s. To achieve this it needs reliable sources for the   
   50 or so   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical minerals required. And Greenland holds concentrated   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quantities of 30 of them, amounting to a considerable chunk   
   of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> world’s total rare earth reserves. But the reality is that   
   with a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> population of just 57,000 – many of them Inuit fishermen and   
   hunters   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca