From: punditster@gmail.com
On 1/11/2026 7:02 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 01:59:59 -0800, dart200
> wrote:
>
>> like i'm not a huge market fan, and most people here are... but can't we
>> all agree markets work best when everyone has as close to perfect
>> information as is possible to build, no?
>
> True information.
>
All information is valid, true or false, for an information junkie.
>
How about that?
>
All incoming information changes the second you input any data by the
simple act of perception. There's no pure data (day-ta).
>
How do you silence the fakers?
>
Turn off your TV and subscribe to absfg, the only non-moderated
discussion group still uncensored on the internet - until you guys came
along.
>
>>> but muh trade secrets!?
>>
>> the stupid part is muh trade secrets/patents were never a design goal of
>> capitalism. patents were supposed to be a *solution* to the problem of
>> trade secrets: give people a recognized monopoly to give out info.
>>
>> people now conflate that with how things should be as if we won't ever
>> again innovate without muh trade secrets ... which is patently false
>> with a long list of various examples including most of academia where
>> profit motive presents a deep conflict of interest in evaluating actual
>> results an objective manner.
>>
>> with 21st century tech, we can do better by requiring that businesses
>> (and governing systems) operate in with real time, full transparency.
>> sure plenty will get massively butthurt, but overtime as we get used to
>> operating/competing in a transparent manner...
>>
>> we will produce something far superior in real economic outcomes!
>>
>> before then probably elevating to some form of 23rd century communism...
>> but transparency first ehh????
>>
>> https://old.reddit.com/r/CapitalismVSocialism/comments/1q8myy
/how_will_you_abolish_the_social_relations_that/nyr41lu/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
