From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:11:24 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
      
   >On 1/14/2026 8:41 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:35:37 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 1/14/2026 8:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2026 21:18:05 -0800, dart200   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 1/13/26 7:40 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 1/12/2026 5:35 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 1/12/26 4:18 PM, vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> *+->> consumer spending is supposed to be the fucking bedrock   
   >>>>>>>> guidance of the   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> COnsumption is the most heavily weighted Keynesian econometric   
   >>>>>>>> variable, true   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> But if you want to grow an economy, you want folks to invest (not   
   >>>>>>>> even save,   
   >>>>>>>> but invest - ie if you are keeping money aside, you are not building   
   >>>>>>>> factories)   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Consumption is not necessarily productive   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> spending for consuming is not keep money aside, it's literally   
   >>>>>>> investing back into those who produced what ur consuming ... without   
   >>>>>>> any expectation of further profiting off it later. cutting taxes on   
   >>>>>>> the rich is actually birdbrained economics.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> tax the fuck out of the rich, literally just give it to the poor, so   
   >>>>>>> they drive the bus in ways that actually help people.   
   >>>>>>    >   
   >>>>>> That's easy for you to say, you've got no skin in the game.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> right cause having a lot of skin in game requires me to act like a   
   >>>>> psychopath, and i'm just not unfortunately   
   >>>>   
   >>>> On target.  Bullseye.   
   >>>>   
   >>> You can't complain about income or income tax if you have no skin in the   
   >>> game - unemployed.   
   >>>   
   >>> Everyone should be equal under the tax laws, and pay a flat and equal   
   >>> tax for everyone. That would be fair and equal. Otherwise you are just   
   >>> biased and perhaps JELLOS. Deal with it.   
   >>>   
   >>> Wealthy people give the most to charity and pay the majority of the US   
   >>> income tax.   
   >>> High taxes taxes on the rich have negative economic impacts, such as   
   >>> disincentivizing investment and innovation.   
   >>>   
   >>> And, the risk of capital flight.   
   >>   
   >> Taping on your shoulder.  You are repeating yourself.  And have been   
   >> quite effectively rebutted by dart and I.  Deal with it.   
   > >   
   >The data shows that most of the charity world wide is given by wealthy   
   >people. Poor people pay zero income taxes. There's no evidence either of   
   >you have any skin in the game. Prove me wrong.   
   >   
   >Apparently, you two are prejudiced against small groups. JELLOS.   
      
   And again.   
   --   
   Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain   
   Don't get political with me young man   
   or I'll tie you to a railroad track and   
   <<>> to <<>>   
   Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?   
   dares: Ned   
   does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)