From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:59:51 -0500, Wilson    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 1/16/2026 4:26 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:20:18 -0500, Wilson    
   >> wrote:   
   >>> On 1/16/2026 3:27 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>> On 1/16/26 12:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 14:20:10 -0500, Wilson    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 1/16/2026 8:44 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 02:10:46 -0800, dart200   
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 1/15/26 11:20 PM, Creon wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Summary execution is apparently fine, if you can find an   
   >>>>>>>>> excuse for it.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> u can't hit an officer with the front of ur car while ignoring lawful   
   >>>>>>>> commands,   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> it's a pretty shit situations all around, had either the officer been   
   >>>>>>>> half a second faster getting out of the way, or good been half a   
   >>>>>>>> second   
   >>>>>>>> slower at gunning it ... perhaps this wouldn't have happened...   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> but it did, and after watching enough body cam videos i don't feel   
   >>>>>>>> that   
   >>>>>>>> trying to lawyer this somehow as a "summary killing" is particularly   
   >>>>>>>> relevant to the kind of split second decision making cops need to make   
   >>>>>>>> when dealing with potentially violent suspects   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> You need to be aware that videos can be edited and changed to look   
   >>>>>>> like what they were not. Your best bet is to get the one available   
   >>>>>>> immediately after the event.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It was filmed by multiple people from different angles at the time it   
   >>>>>> happened. These were all available within minutes. I think Nick has the   
   >>>>>> facts correct.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It was sad and tragic.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Yet, you continue to believe those who claim the cop was hit. I have   
   >>>>> video analysis from ny times of body cams from various angles. I   
   >>>>   
   >>>> bruh it's pretty clear from multiple videos he was hit, just not badly   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> don't imagine you would care to see them, but if I misjudge you, let   
   >>>>> me know.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> sure post them, but i've already seen several analysis just not take   
   >>>> into consideration all the videos that wilson just posted here and now   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> One of those videos showed that after the event someone (apparently her   
   >>>>>> partner) was screaming: "Why did you have real bullets?"   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://x.com/0rf/status/2009792061223190783   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> How could she not know law enforcement uses real bullets??   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It is an expression of her horror at seeing a loved one killed. You   
   >>>>> really have no compassion do you? Your response to her horror is to   
   >>>>> mock.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> bruh lefties spent so much time talking down police they forget that the   
   >>>> police actually have a fairly tough job in american society and are   
   >>>> forced to make split second decisions about life and death, not only for   
   >>>> themselves, but their fellow officers, as well as any civilians involved   
   >>>>   
   >>>> i can't say i agree with everything the police do certainly, and more   
   >>>> reforms for transparency/honest/training are good things... but i   
   >>>> respect them enough to not put them in a position where they have the   
   >>>> make those decisions, especially about my own life...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> i do not thing good meant to hit the officer at all, unfortunately,   
   >>>> which really makes this all the more tragic   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Did she think this was just a game? Some of the people they're arresting   
   >>>>>> are cartel gang members and violent criminals. Of COURSE they're going   
   >>>>>> to be armed with real bullets. They aren't crowd-control who respond to   
   >>>>>> riots with bean-bag rounds and pepper balls, just trying to make   
   >>>>>> everyone go home.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> No matter what you think of the police or the importance of your cause,   
   >>>>>> when any officer tells you to stop and get out of your car you don't   
   >>>>>> attempt to drive through them.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://x.com/GrageDustin/status/2010037103665787019   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://x.com/AlphaNews/status/2009679932289626385   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://x.com/0rf/status/2009792063282335955   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/2009310786833772907   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://x.com/OliLondonTV/status/2009032168685609371   
   >>>   
   >>> Noah won't watch any of these videos I posted. The same goes with what   
   >>> anyone says. His mind is already made up.   
   >>   
   >> 1) if a different vid shows something different, it is simply a matter   
   >> of what you choose to believe.   
   >> 2) I choose to not consider x a reliable source of information.   
   >> 3) ny times is much better   
   >>   
   >> I assume you won't watch the video I posted. The same goes with what   
   >> anyone says. Your mind is already made up.   
   >   
   >I watched the video, it does a decent job of putting everything   
   >together. Easy to understand. And clearly shows the car pushing the ice   
   >officer because she did in fact drive right at him.   
   >   
   >I think she should not have tried to drive away from the officers after   
   >they told her to get out of the car. I also think he should not have   
   >shot her.   
      
   Nuff said, stop right there. He should not have shot her.   
      
   >When police tell you to get out of your car it's not a suggestion or a   
   >friendly request.   
   >   
   >She was being detained, and in her actions she committed one, maybe two   
   >felonies.   
      
   Suspected felonies. That is for the court to decide.   
      
   >Now your turn. One of the videos I posted above is from a nearby   
   >residence that showed what she was doing the 3 minutes before the   
   >interaction. It's instructive.   
      
   X is not a reliable source of information.   
   --   
   Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain   
   Don't get political with me young man   
   or I'll tie you to a railroad track and   
   <<>> to <<>>   
   Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?   
   dares: Ned   
   does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|