From: fedora@fea.st
On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 14:45:38 -0800, Dude wrote:
>On 1/16/2026 2:11 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:59:51 -0500, Wilson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/16/2026 4:26 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 16:20:18 -0500, Wilson
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 1/16/2026 3:27 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/16/26 12:14 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 14:20:10 -0500, Wilson
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/16/2026 8:44 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 02:10:46 -0800, dart200
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/15/26 11:20 PM, Creon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Summary execution is apparently fine, if you can find an
>>>>>>>>>>> excuse for it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> u can't hit an officer with the front of ur car while ignoring
lawful
>>>>>>>>>> commands,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> it's a pretty shit situations all around, had either the officer
been
>>>>>>>>>> half a second faster getting out of the way, or good been half a
>>>>>>>>>> second
>>>>>>>>>> slower at gunning it ... perhaps this wouldn't have happened...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> but it did, and after watching enough body cam videos i don't feel
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> trying to lawyer this somehow as a "summary killing" is particularly
>>>>>>>>>> relevant to the kind of split second decision making cops need to
make
>>>>>>>>>> when dealing with potentially violent suspects
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You need to be aware that videos can be edited and changed to look
>>>>>>>>> like what they were not. Your best bet is to get the one available
>>>>>>>>> immediately after the event.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It was filmed by multiple people from different angles at the time it
>>>>>>>> happened. These were all available within minutes. I think Nick has
the
>>>>>>>> facts correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It was sad and tragic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yet, you continue to believe those who claim the cop was hit. I have
>>>>>>> video analysis from ny times of body cams from various angles. I
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bruh it's pretty clear from multiple videos he was hit, just not badly
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> don't imagine you would care to see them, but if I misjudge you, let
>>>>>>> me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sure post them, but i've already seen several analysis just not take
>>>>>> into consideration all the videos that wilson just posted here and now
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One of those videos showed that after the event someone (apparently
her
>>>>>>>> partner) was screaming: "Why did you have real bullets?"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://x.com/0rf/status/2009792061223190783
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How could she not know law enforcement uses real bullets??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is an expression of her horror at seeing a loved one killed. You
>>>>>>> really have no compassion do you? Your response to her horror is to
>>>>>>> mock.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bruh lefties spent so much time talking down police they forget that the
>>>>>> police actually have a fairly tough job in american society and are
>>>>>> forced to make split second decisions about life and death, not only for
>>>>>> themselves, but their fellow officers, as well as any civilians involved
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i can't say i agree with everything the police do certainly, and more
>>>>>> reforms for transparency/honest/training are good things... but i
>>>>>> respect them enough to not put them in a position where they have the
>>>>>> make those decisions, especially about my own life...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i do not thing good meant to hit the officer at all, unfortunately,
>>>>>> which really makes this all the more tragic
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Did she think this was just a game? Some of the people they're
arresting
>>>>>>>> are cartel gang members and violent criminals. Of COURSE they're going
>>>>>>>> to be armed with real bullets. They aren't crowd-control who respond
to
>>>>>>>> riots with bean-bag rounds and pepper balls, just trying to make
>>>>>>>> everyone go home.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No matter what you think of the police or the importance of your
cause,
>>>>>>>> when any officer tells you to stop and get out of your car you don't
>>>>>>>> attempt to drive through them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://x.com/GrageDustin/status/2010037103665787019
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://x.com/AlphaNews/status/2009679932289626385
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://x.com/0rf/status/2009792063282335955
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/2009310786833772907
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://x.com/OliLondonTV/status/2009032168685609371
>>>>>
>>>>> Noah won't watch any of these videos I posted. The same goes with what
>>>>> anyone says. His mind is already made up.
>>>>
>>>> 1) if a different vid shows something different, it is simply a matter
>>>> of what you choose to believe.
>>>> 2) I choose to not consider x a reliable source of information.
>>>> 3) ny times is much better
>>>>
>>>> I assume you won't watch the video I posted. The same goes with what
>>>> anyone says. Your mind is already made up.
>>>
>>> I watched the video, it does a decent job of putting everything
>>> together. Easy to understand. And clearly shows the car pushing the ice
>>> officer because she did in fact drive right at him.
>>>
>>> I think she should not have tried to drive away from the officers after
>>> they told her to get out of the car. I also think he should not have
>>> shot her.
>>
>> Nuff said, stop right there. He should not have shot her.
>>
>>> When police tell you to get out of your car it's not a suggestion or a
>>> friendly request.
>>>
>>> She was being detained, and in her actions she committed one, maybe two
>>> felonies.
>>
>> Suspected felonies. That is for the court to decide.
>>
>>> Now your turn. One of the videos I posted above is from a nearby
>>> residence that showed what she was doing the 3 minutes before the
>>> interaction. It's instructive.
>>
>> X is not a reliable source of information.
> >
>"All the News That's Fit to Print" - The New York Times is on X.
>
>"A woman was shot and killed after she drove her SUV into the middle of
>the agents in an attempt to impede an immigration operation." - RedState
>
I don't share your conviction that this is actually ny times on x.
Although it might be. Not worth the added risk of fakery. And I do
not believe that the content for which I pay $90 a year is available
for free on x. Not credible.
--
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<>> to <<>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
