Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.buddha.short.fat.guy    |    Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism    |    155,846 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 154,438 of 155,846    |
|    dart200 to Julian    |
|    Re: The censors are winning    |
|    30 Jan 26 10:12:45    |
      From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid              i mean lefties are railing about inequity within the richest nation       state of the world while the worst inequities are categorically formed       across nation state borders              On 1/30/26 5:33 AM, Julian wrote:       > They say you should never meet your heroes, a rule that is not always       > correct. But I did have a salutary session some years ago when a friend       > in New York asked me if I wanted to meet a comedian I really do admire.       >       > I had been looking forward to the meeting, but unfortunately it took       > place during the summer of 2020. If you remember those far-distant days,       > this was a time when America was obsessing over the story of alleged       > disproportionate police violence against black Americans. One of the       > cases was that of a woman named Breonna Taylor. Although the case for       > the police’s actions and the victim’s innocence revolved around a number       > of issues, the main one was whether officers should have shot when they       > did. As ever, this involved highly specific ballistics issues and a       > considerable amount of hindsight. For two hours I sat with my comedy       > hero discussing post-mortem reports and bullet trajectories.       >       > Certainly I have had funnier meetings. I went away dismayed for a number       > of reasons. One was the fact that this seemed such a bizarre way to       > litigate a case. Yes it was important, but is it healthy for everyone to       > obsess over it in such minute detail?       >       > The thought recurred to me this week with the shooting of a second       > protestor by ICE officials in Minnesota. These officials are currently       > going after a good many people who broke into America illegally and have       > then continued to commit other crimes while in the country. The point of       > why the American taxpayer should continue to fund and allow this is a       > sore one for many. Other Americans – mainly on the left – believe that       > ICE either should not perform these raids, or should conduct them with a       > greater degree of decorum. As a result, prominent Democrat politicians       > and others have been encouraging protestors to stand in ICE’s way,       > something which already led to the death of Renée Nicole Good three       > weeks ago.       >       > The nature of this second shooting – of an anti-ICE protestor called       > Alex Pretti – has now returned America to the ballistics obsession.       > Online rumours claimed that the ICU nurse had fired at officers with a       > gun he was carrying. Then it was suggested that his firearm may have       > accidentally discharged.       >       > The story has led the bulletins around the world. And it made me wonder       > again about this state of things. Yes, it is important to Americans who       > their federal officials take shots at, and why. But why are these cases       > getting so much more attention in the news cycle than, say, the reported       > shootings of tens of thousands of brave protestors on the streets of Iran?       >       > The answer is, in part, a very simple one: visuals. As with the handful       > of black people killed by US police during the 2010s, these recent ICE       > killings benefit from taking place in a society where almost everyone       > owns a phone camera. Think of the number of angles the world was able to       > see of the death of George Floyd. Members of the public had cameras;       > police turned out to have bodycam footage.       >       > It is the same with those killed while trying to monitor or stop ICE       > going about their duties. Within minutes of the event, the news has gone       > around the internet. People are able to analyse the footage for       > themselves and reach their own conclusions. Then a second angle video       > comes out, sometimes a third and so on. Law enforcement officers’       > footage will emerge, too. Within 24 hours everybody can be an expert,       > not just on the shooting, but on how differently they might have reacted       > were they the federal agent in such a situation coming across a handgun.       >       > Which returns me to the subject of Iran. Why hasn’t there been a       > greater global outcry about the untold number of protestors being gunned       > down on its streets by regime thugs intent on suppressing the anti-       > regime movement? Why, even weeks after Donald Trump gave warning that       > the world would not stand by and watch Iranians being massacred, has       > nothing been done to support the protests?       >       > I am afraid the explanation is that we haven’t watched the violence       > unfold in real time, because of a difference between free and unfree       > societies. Censorship works. If you search online, you can find footage       > of the aftermath of the Iran massacres. There are even some tapes that       > appear to show the Basij militia and other regime forces taking aim at       > the crowds. But the mullahs were clever at the outset of these       > uprisings. They turned off the internet and other communications       > channels, and as a result the world has had to rely on small bits of       > footage smuggled out by dissidents.       >       > All this is happening in a visual culture where if something hasn’t       > appeared online then it effectively has not happened. What are mere       > reports of tens of thousands of Iranians being killed if we lack the       > visuals?       >       > Of course, one reason for the lack of balance is that the violence is       > happening in one country – America – and the other in a theocratic       > dictatorship. But it is also the fact that when the mullahs flick the       > switch and carry out massacres in effective darkness their trick works.       > The US President and others warned the Iranians not to execute       > protestors in public. There was talk of the suspension of some public       > hangings. But there has been no reported let-up in the public shootings       > of thousands. The only thing we have lacked is the crucial footage of       > every interaction that might have caused the world to feel forced to       > know – and act.       >       > More footage is coming out. The window seems to be closing when outside       > intervention, plus the domestic pressure inside Iran, might have       > coalesced. If that is the case then it is obviously a tragedy for the       > Iranian people. It also says something tragic about our own culture.       > Dictatorships manipulate – that is their operating procedure. But for us       > to allow ourselves to be manipulated is another thing entirely.       >       >       > Douglas Murray                     --       arising us out of the computing dark ages,       please excuse my pseudo-pyscript,       ~ nick              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca