home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.buddha.short.fat.guy      Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism      155,846 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 154,447 of 155,846   
   Dude to Julian   
   Re: Amelia: the purple-haired goth girl    
   30 Jan 26 15:21:00   
   
   From: punditster@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/30/2026 1:08 PM, Julian wrote:   
   > It has been obvious for some time that there are basic concepts that the   
   > liberal British Establishment simply does not understand. Like money. Or   
   > tax. Or business. Or going to the pub. Or the fundamental value of free   
   > speech.   
   >   
   > Well, now we can add a whole new roster of more baroque concepts to this   
   > list: meme culture, e-girls, semiotics, détournement, the subtext of   
   > black chokers and basic human nature. And all because of a purple-haired   
   > young cartoon woman called Amelia.   
   >   
   > Before we get to Amelia, we need to understand what created her –   
   > because the joke can only be grasped once you appreciate the lunacy that   
   > came before her minxy pink dresses. Amelia comes from a game called   
   > Pathways: Navigating Gaming, the Internet and Extremism. It was   
   > developed last year by local authorities in East Yorkshire with public   
   > money as part of the Prevent anti-radicalisation programme. Ostensibly,   
   > it was an educational tool for schoolchildren and college students.   
   >   
   > The player starts as ‘Charlie’, a new student trying to settle into   
   > college life. Charlie seems to be gender-fluid and is referred to   
   > throughout as ‘they/them’. And poor old Charlie’s task is to learn what   
   > kind of thinking is officially permitted.   
   >   
   > The game is simple. Certain actions are ‘good’; others are ‘bad’.   
   Make   
   > too many bad choices and you are, within the logic of the game, deemed   
   > radicalised. Looking up immigration statistics? Bad. Expressing concern   
   > about job competition? Bad. Watching videos that criticise government   
   > immigration policy? Bad. Talking about English identity, heritage or   
   > cultural continuity? Very bad indeed: do not pass Go, do not collect   
   > £200, go directly to Prevent.   
   >   
   > The effect is, to say the least, unsubtle. To question mass immigration,   
   > to care about national identity, to simply wonder about the merits of   
   > multiculturalism, is to place yourself on a conveyor belt towards   
   > extremism. Every Charlie is a potential fascist in the eyes of East   
   > Yorkshire educationalists.   
   >   
   > This is where Amelia comes in. She appears in one of the early scenarios   
   > as Charlie’s friend: outspoken, political, sceptical of immigration,   
   > interested in protests and nationalist groups. Within the logic of   
   > Pathways, she’s a warning sign. Stay away from the fash-adjacent temptress.   
   >   
   > The problem is that Amelia does not look like a Nazi villain. She looks   
   > intriguing. She has purple hair, a black BDSM-y choker and a goth girl   
   > aesthetic.   
   >   
   > For more than a decade, the goth or e-girl archetype has been one of the   
   > most consistently adored figures in online meme culture, from the ‘Big   
   > Tiddy Goth GF’ to the Doomer Girl. These characters are almost always   
   > sympathetic, desirable, aspirational, sexy. They signify non-conformity,   
   > authenticity and resistance.   
   >   
   > On 9 January, the game escaped containment and went viral. Screenshots   
   > from it began circulating on X. The tone was ironic admiration – ‘Wait,   
   > they made the cute goth girl the racist?’ – but irony quickly melted   
   > into something warmer and more mischievous. Amelia became an object of   
   > playful devotion, deliberate provocation and delicious eroticism.   
   >   
   > Fan art followed. AI-generated images and videos placed her in front of   
   > Big Ben, in English pubs, wrapped in Union Flags, laughing at Keir   
   > Starmer (‘How did we go from Churchill to you, you git?’), and leaping   
   > into a Spitfire to stop boats in the Channel. She was recast not as a   
   > cautionary figure, but as a symbol of exactly the sentiments the game   
   > was trying to suppress.   
   >   
   > To get mildly pretentious, what happened was détournement in the   
   > Situationist sense: an institutional message hijacked and turned against   
   > itself. A state-funded warning against nationalism became a nationalist   
   > icon. The sign was turned upside down.   
   >   
   > The authorities then made it all worse. Rather than owning and   
   > acknowledging the failure, they took the game offline. Links stopped   
   > working. The Amelia scenario became less accessible. What might have   
   > remained a niche embarrassment became a cause célèbre. The removal   
   > itself became proof, in the eyes of Amelia’s admirers, that the state   
   > was frightened of its own creation. Consequently, Amelia did not   
   > disappear. Go on X, Facebook, TikTok or many other internet sites and   
   > you will find Amelia doing all sorts of politically incorrect things.   
   > Her purple-haired rebellion has also been covered by Die Welt and the   
   > Guardian and birthed copy-cat equivalents across Europe and beyond.   
   >   
   > https://twitter.com/AmeliajakSolana/status/2015939362605629846?s=20   
   >   
   > Does it mean anything important, or is it all just amusing internet   
   > froth? I believe it does have significance, even if Amelia disappears   
   > tomorrow. Amelia is final proof, in the age of the viral AI meme, that   
   > the government no longer has any chance of controlling the narrative,   
   > let alone establishing one in the first place.   
   >   
   > This goes against every instinct and reflex of the British   
   > Establishment. Because, if the Establishment exists to do anything, it   
   > is to control us. This is why Starmer is so desperate to ban X for   
   > putting fake bikinis on women, while taking a year to announce a   
   > possible inquiry into nationwide grooming gangs.   
   >   
   > Happily, this is one battle the Establishment simply cannot win. It has   
   > been said that the internet is the subconscious of humanity. And, as   
   > Freud observed, in the end the subconscious will always decide what we   
   > do. Dreams denote desires, and desires determine reality. In other   
   > words: go, Amelia.   
   >   
   >   
   > Sean Thomas   
    >   
   "I love England!" - Amelia   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca