Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.buddha.short.fat.guy    |    Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism    |    155,846 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 154,450 of 155,846    |
|    dart200 to Dude    |
|    Re: The censors are winning (1/2)    |
|    30 Jan 26 12:24:03    |
      From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid              On 1/30/26 11:54 AM, Dude wrote:       > On 1/30/2026 10:12 AM, dart200 wrote:       >> i mean lefties are railing about inequity within the richest nation       >> state of the world while the worst inequities are categorically formed       >> across nation state borders       >>       > "The Western liberal media is ignoring the Iranian uprising because       > explaining it would force an admission it is desperate to avoid: the       > Iranian people are rebelling against Islam itself, and that fact       > shatters the moral framework through which these institutions understand       > the world.              what is that moral framework eh???              >       > That is what terrifies Western liberal media. And that is why the       > Iranian people are being ignored. So the silence continues."       > - Tahmineh, Quora       > >       >> On 1/30/26 5:33 AM, Julian wrote:       >>> They say you should never meet your heroes, a rule that is not always       >>> correct. But I did have a salutary session some years ago when a       >>> friend in New York asked me if I wanted to meet a comedian I really       >>> do admire.       >>>       >>> I had been looking forward to the meeting, but unfortunately it took       >>> place during the summer of 2020. If you remember those far-distant       >>> days, this was a time when America was obsessing over the story of       >>> alleged disproportionate police violence against black Americans. One       >>> of the cases was that of a woman named Breonna Taylor. Although the       >>> case for the police’s actions and the victim’s innocence revolved       >>> around a number of issues, the main one was whether officers should       >>> have shot when they did. As ever, this involved highly specific       >>> ballistics issues and a considerable amount of hindsight. For two       >>> hours I sat with my comedy hero discussing post-mortem reports and       >>> bullet trajectories.       >>>       >>> Certainly I have had funnier meetings. I went away dismayed for a       >>> number of reasons. One was the fact that this seemed such a bizarre       >>> way to litigate a case. Yes it was important, but is it healthy for       >>> everyone to obsess over it in such minute detail?       >>>       >>> The thought recurred to me this week with the shooting of a second       >>> protestor by ICE officials in Minnesota. These officials are       >>> currently going after a good many people who broke into America       >>> illegally and have then continued to commit other crimes while in the       >>> country. The point of why the American taxpayer should continue to       >>> fund and allow this is a sore one for many. Other Americans – mainly       >>> on the left – believe that ICE either should not perform these raids,       >>> or should conduct them with a greater degree of decorum. As a result,       >>> prominent Democrat politicians and others have been encouraging       >>> protestors to stand in ICE’s way, something which already led to the       >>> death of Renée Nicole Good three weeks ago.       >>>       >>> The nature of this second shooting – of an anti-ICE protestor called       >>> Alex Pretti – has now returned America to the ballistics obsession.       >>> Online rumours claimed that the ICU nurse had fired at officers with       >>> a gun he was carrying. Then it was suggested that his firearm may       >>> have accidentally discharged.       >>>       >>> The story has led the bulletins around the world. And it made me       >>> wonder again about this state of things. Yes, it is important to       >>> Americans who their federal officials take shots at, and why. But why       >>> are these cases getting so much more attention in the news cycle       >>> than, say, the reported shootings of tens of thousands of brave       >>> protestors on the streets of Iran?       >>>       >>> The answer is, in part, a very simple one: visuals. As with the       >>> handful of black people killed by US police during the 2010s, these       >>> recent ICE killings benefit from taking place in a society where       >>> almost everyone owns a phone camera. Think of the number of angles       >>> the world was able to see of the death of George Floyd. Members of       >>> the public had cameras; police turned out to have bodycam footage.       >>>       >>> It is the same with those killed while trying to monitor or stop ICE       >>> going about their duties. Within minutes of the event, the news has       >>> gone around the internet. People are able to analyse the footage for       >>> themselves and reach their own conclusions. Then a second angle video       >>> comes out, sometimes a third and so on. Law enforcement officers’       >>> footage will emerge, too. Within 24 hours everybody can be an expert,       >>> not just on the shooting, but on how differently they might have       >>> reacted were they the federal agent in such a situation coming across       >>> a handgun.       >>>       >>> Which returns me to the subject of Iran. Why hasn’t there been a       >>> greater global outcry about the untold number of protestors being       >>> gunned down on its streets by regime thugs intent on suppressing the       >>> anti- regime movement? Why, even weeks after Donald Trump gave       >>> warning that the world would not stand by and watch Iranians being       >>> massacred, has nothing been done to support the protests?       >>>       >>> I am afraid the explanation is that we haven’t watched the violence       >>> unfold in real time, because of a difference between free and unfree       >>> societies. Censorship works. If you search online, you can find       >>> footage of the aftermath of the Iran massacres. There are even some       >>> tapes that appear to show the Basij militia and other regime forces       >>> taking aim at the crowds. But the mullahs were clever at the outset       >>> of these uprisings. They turned off the internet and other       >>> communications channels, and as a result the world has had to rely on       >>> small bits of footage smuggled out by dissidents.       >>>       >>> All this is happening in a visual culture where if something hasn’t       >>> appeared online then it effectively has not happened. What are mere       >>> reports of tens of thousands of Iranians being killed if we lack the       >>> visuals?       >>>       >>> Of course, one reason for the lack of balance is that the violence is       >>> happening in one country – America – and the other in a theocratic       >>> dictatorship. But it is also the fact that when the mullahs flick the       >>> switch and carry out massacres in effective darkness their trick       >>> works. The US President and others warned the Iranians not to execute       >>> protestors in public. There was talk of the suspension of some public       >>> hangings. But there has been no reported let-up in the public       >>> shootings of thousands. The only thing we have lacked is the crucial       >>> footage of every interaction that might have caused the world to feel       >>> forced to know – and act.       >>>       >>> More footage is coming out. The window seems to be closing when              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca