Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.buddha.short.fat.guy    |    Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism    |    155,846 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 154,471 of 155,846    |
|    Wilson to Dude    |
|    Re: Amelia: the purple-haired goth girl     |
|    31 Jan 26 11:25:00    |
      From: Wilson@nowhere.invalid              On 1/30/2026 6:21 PM, Dude wrote:       > On 1/30/2026 1:08 PM, Julian wrote:       >> It has been obvious for some time that there are basic concepts that       >> the liberal British Establishment simply does not understand. Like       >> money. Or tax. Or business. Or going to the pub. Or the fundamental       >> value of free speech.       >>       >> Well, now we can add a whole new roster of more baroque concepts to       >> this list: meme culture, e-girls, semiotics, détournement, the subtext       >> of black chokers and basic human nature. And all because of a purple-       >> haired young cartoon woman called Amelia.       >>       >> Before we get to Amelia, we need to understand what created her –       >> because the joke can only be grasped once you appreciate the lunacy       >> that came before her minxy pink dresses. Amelia comes from a game       >> called Pathways: Navigating Gaming, the Internet and Extremism. It was       >> developed last year by local authorities in East Yorkshire with public       >> money as part of the Prevent anti-radicalisation programme.       >> Ostensibly, it was an educational tool for schoolchildren and college       >> students.       >>       >> The player starts as ‘Charlie’, a new student trying to settle into       >> college life. Charlie seems to be gender-fluid and is referred to       >> throughout as ‘they/them’. And poor old Charlie’s task is to learn       >> what kind of thinking is officially permitted.       >>       >> The game is simple. Certain actions are ‘good’; others are ‘bad’.       Make       >> too many bad choices and you are, within the logic of the game, deemed       >> radicalised. Looking up immigration statistics? Bad. Expressing       >> concern about job competition? Bad. Watching videos that criticise       >> government immigration policy? Bad. Talking about English identity,       >> heritage or cultural continuity? Very bad indeed: do not pass Go, do       >> not collect £200, go directly to Prevent.       >>       >> The effect is, to say the least, unsubtle. To question mass       >> immigration, to care about national identity, to simply wonder about       >> the merits of multiculturalism, is to place yourself on a conveyor       >> belt towards extremism. Every Charlie is a potential fascist in the       >> eyes of East Yorkshire educationalists.       >>       >> This is where Amelia comes in. She appears in one of the early       >> scenarios as Charlie’s friend: outspoken, political, sceptical of       >> immigration, interested in protests and nationalist groups. Within the       >> logic of Pathways, she’s a warning sign. Stay away from the fash-       >> adjacent temptress.       >>       >> The problem is that Amelia does not look like a Nazi villain. She       >> looks intriguing. She has purple hair, a black BDSM-y choker and a       >> goth girl aesthetic.       >>       >> For more than a decade, the goth or e-girl archetype has been one of       >> the most consistently adored figures in online meme culture, from the       >> ‘Big Tiddy Goth GF’ to the Doomer Girl. These characters are almost       >> always sympathetic, desirable, aspirational, sexy. They signify non-       >> conformity, authenticity and resistance.       >>       >> On 9 January, the game escaped containment and went viral. Screenshots       >> from it began circulating on X. The tone was ironic admiration –       >> ‘Wait, they made the cute goth girl the racist?’ – but irony quickly       >> melted into something warmer and more mischievous. Amelia became an       >> object of playful devotion, deliberate provocation and delicious       >> eroticism.       >>       >> Fan art followed. AI-generated images and videos placed her in front       >> of Big Ben, in English pubs, wrapped in Union Flags, laughing at Keir       >> Starmer (‘How did we go from Churchill to you, you git?’), and leaping       >> into a Spitfire to stop boats in the Channel. She was recast not as a       >> cautionary figure, but as a symbol of exactly the sentiments the game       >> was trying to suppress.       >>       >> To get mildly pretentious, what happened was détournement in the       >> Situationist sense: an institutional message hijacked and turned       >> against itself. A state-funded warning against nationalism became a       >> nationalist icon. The sign was turned upside down.       >>       >> The authorities then made it all worse. Rather than owning and       >> acknowledging the failure, they took the game offline. Links stopped       >> working. The Amelia scenario became less accessible. What might have       >> remained a niche embarrassment became a cause célèbre. The removal       >> itself became proof, in the eyes of Amelia’s admirers, that the state       >> was frightened of its own creation. Consequently, Amelia did not       >> disappear. Go on X, Facebook, TikTok or many other internet sites and       >> you will find Amelia doing all sorts of politically incorrect things.       >> Her purple-haired rebellion has also been covered by Die Welt and the       >> Guardian and birthed copy-cat equivalents across Europe and beyond.       >>       >> https://twitter.com/AmeliajakSolana/status/2015939362605629846?s=20       >>       >> Does it mean anything important, or is it all just amusing internet       >> froth? I believe it does have significance, even if Amelia disappears       >> tomorrow. Amelia is final proof, in the age of the viral AI meme, that       >> the government no longer has any chance of controlling the narrative,       >> let alone establishing one in the first place.       >>       >> This goes against every instinct and reflex of the British       >> Establishment. Because, if the Establishment exists to do anything, it       >> is to control us. This is why Starmer is so desperate to ban X for       >> putting fake bikinis on women, while taking a year to announce a       >> possible inquiry into nationwide grooming gangs.       >>       >> Happily, this is one battle the Establishment simply cannot win. It       >> has been said that the internet is the subconscious of humanity. And,       >> as Freud observed, in the end the subconscious will always decide what       >> we do. Dreams denote desires, and desires determine reality. In other       >> words: go, Amelia.       >>       >>       >> Sean Thomas       > >       > "I love England!" - Amelia              Clearly subversive.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca