home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.buddha.short.fat.guy      Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism      155,846 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 154,471 of 155,846   
   Wilson to Dude   
   Re: Amelia: the purple-haired goth girl    
   31 Jan 26 11:25:00   
   
   From: Wilson@nowhere.invalid   
      
   On 1/30/2026 6:21 PM, Dude wrote:   
   > On 1/30/2026 1:08 PM, Julian wrote:   
   >> It has been obvious for some time that there are basic concepts that   
   >> the liberal British Establishment simply does not understand. Like   
   >> money. Or tax. Or business. Or going to the pub. Or the fundamental   
   >> value of free speech.   
   >>   
   >> Well, now we can add a whole new roster of more baroque concepts to   
   >> this list: meme culture, e-girls, semiotics, détournement, the subtext   
   >> of black chokers and basic human nature. And all because of a purple-   
   >> haired young cartoon woman called Amelia.   
   >>   
   >> Before we get to Amelia, we need to understand what created her –   
   >> because the joke can only be grasped once you appreciate the lunacy   
   >> that came before her minxy pink dresses. Amelia comes from a game   
   >> called Pathways: Navigating Gaming, the Internet and Extremism. It was   
   >> developed last year by local authorities in East Yorkshire with public   
   >> money as part of the Prevent anti-radicalisation programme.   
   >> Ostensibly, it was an educational tool for schoolchildren and college   
   >> students.   
   >>   
   >> The player starts as ‘Charlie’, a new student trying to settle into   
   >> college life. Charlie seems to be gender-fluid and is referred to   
   >> throughout as ‘they/them’. And poor old Charlie’s task is to learn   
   >> what kind of thinking is officially permitted.   
   >>   
   >> The game is simple. Certain actions are ‘good’; others are ‘bad’.   
   Make   
   >> too many bad choices and you are, within the logic of the game, deemed   
   >> radicalised. Looking up immigration statistics? Bad. Expressing   
   >> concern about job competition? Bad. Watching videos that criticise   
   >> government immigration policy? Bad. Talking about English identity,   
   >> heritage or cultural continuity? Very bad indeed: do not pass Go, do   
   >> not collect £200, go directly to Prevent.   
   >>   
   >> The effect is, to say the least, unsubtle. To question mass   
   >> immigration, to care about national identity, to simply wonder about   
   >> the merits of multiculturalism, is to place yourself on a conveyor   
   >> belt towards extremism. Every Charlie is a potential fascist in the   
   >> eyes of East Yorkshire educationalists.   
   >>   
   >> This is where Amelia comes in. She appears in one of the early   
   >> scenarios as Charlie’s friend: outspoken, political, sceptical of   
   >> immigration, interested in protests and nationalist groups. Within the   
   >> logic of Pathways, she’s a warning sign. Stay away from the fash-   
   >> adjacent temptress.   
   >>   
   >> The problem is that Amelia does not look like a Nazi villain. She   
   >> looks intriguing. She has purple hair, a black BDSM-y choker and a   
   >> goth girl aesthetic.   
   >>   
   >> For more than a decade, the goth or e-girl archetype has been one of   
   >> the most consistently adored figures in online meme culture, from the   
   >> ‘Big Tiddy Goth GF’ to the Doomer Girl. These characters are almost   
   >> always sympathetic, desirable, aspirational, sexy. They signify non-   
   >> conformity, authenticity and resistance.   
   >>   
   >> On 9 January, the game escaped containment and went viral. Screenshots   
   >> from it began circulating on X. The tone was ironic admiration –   
   >> ‘Wait, they made the cute goth girl the racist?’ – but irony quickly   
   >> melted into something warmer and more mischievous. Amelia became an   
   >> object of playful devotion, deliberate provocation and delicious   
   >> eroticism.   
   >>   
   >> Fan art followed. AI-generated images and videos placed her in front   
   >> of Big Ben, in English pubs, wrapped in Union Flags, laughing at Keir   
   >> Starmer (‘How did we go from Churchill to you, you git?’), and leaping   
   >> into a Spitfire to stop boats in the Channel. She was recast not as a   
   >> cautionary figure, but as a symbol of exactly the sentiments the game   
   >> was trying to suppress.   
   >>   
   >> To get mildly pretentious, what happened was détournement in the   
   >> Situationist sense: an institutional message hijacked and turned   
   >> against itself. A state-funded warning against nationalism became a   
   >> nationalist icon. The sign was turned upside down.   
   >>   
   >> The authorities then made it all worse. Rather than owning and   
   >> acknowledging the failure, they took the game offline. Links stopped   
   >> working. The Amelia scenario became less accessible. What might have   
   >> remained a niche embarrassment became a cause célèbre. The removal   
   >> itself became proof, in the eyes of Amelia’s admirers, that the state   
   >> was frightened of its own creation. Consequently, Amelia did not   
   >> disappear. Go on X, Facebook, TikTok or many other internet sites and   
   >> you will find Amelia doing all sorts of politically incorrect things.   
   >> Her purple-haired rebellion has also been covered by Die Welt and the   
   >> Guardian and birthed copy-cat equivalents across Europe and beyond.   
   >>   
   >> https://twitter.com/AmeliajakSolana/status/2015939362605629846?s=20   
   >>   
   >> Does it mean anything important, or is it all just amusing internet   
   >> froth? I believe it does have significance, even if Amelia disappears   
   >> tomorrow. Amelia is final proof, in the age of the viral AI meme, that   
   >> the government no longer has any chance of controlling the narrative,   
   >> let alone establishing one in the first place.   
   >>   
   >> This goes against every instinct and reflex of the British   
   >> Establishment. Because, if the Establishment exists to do anything, it   
   >> is to control us. This is why Starmer is so desperate to ban X for   
   >> putting fake bikinis on women, while taking a year to announce a   
   >> possible inquiry into nationwide grooming gangs.   
   >>   
   >> Happily, this is one battle the Establishment simply cannot win. It   
   >> has been said that the internet is the subconscious of humanity. And,   
   >> as Freud observed, in the end the subconscious will always decide what   
   >> we do. Dreams denote desires, and desires determine reality. In other   
   >> words: go, Amelia.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Sean Thomas   
   >  >   
   > "I love England!" - Amelia   
      
   Clearly subversive.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca