home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.buddha.short.fat.guy      Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism      155,846 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 154,475 of 155,846   
   Dude to Wilson   
   Re: Amelia: the purple-haired goth girl    
   31 Jan 26 09:28:08   
   
   From: punditster@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/31/2026 8:25 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   > On 1/30/2026 6:21 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >> On 1/30/2026 1:08 PM, Julian wrote:   
   >>> It has been obvious for some time that there are basic concepts that   
   >>> the liberal British Establishment simply does not understand. Like   
   >>> money. Or tax. Or business. Or going to the pub. Or the fundamental   
   >>> value of free speech.   
   >>>   
   >>> Well, now we can add a whole new roster of more baroque concepts to   
   >>> this list: meme culture, e-girls, semiotics, détournement, the   
   >>> subtext of black chokers and basic human nature. And all because of a   
   >>> purple- haired young cartoon woman called Amelia.   
   >>>   
   >>> Before we get to Amelia, we need to understand what created her –   
   >>> because the joke can only be grasped once you appreciate the lunacy   
   >>> that came before her minxy pink dresses. Amelia comes from a game   
   >>> called Pathways: Navigating Gaming, the Internet and Extremism. It   
   >>> was developed last year by local authorities in East Yorkshire with   
   >>> public money as part of the Prevent anti-radicalisation programme.   
   >>> Ostensibly, it was an educational tool for schoolchildren and college   
   >>> students.   
   >>>   
   >>> The player starts as ‘Charlie’, a new student trying to settle into   
   >>> college life. Charlie seems to be gender-fluid and is referred to   
   >>> throughout as ‘they/them’. And poor old Charlie’s task is to learn   
   >>> what kind of thinking is officially permitted.   
   >>>   
   >>> The game is simple. Certain actions are ‘good’; others are ‘bad’.   
   >>> Make too many bad choices and you are, within the logic of the game,   
   >>> deemed radicalised. Looking up immigration statistics? Bad.   
   >>> Expressing concern about job competition? Bad. Watching videos that   
   >>> criticise government immigration policy? Bad. Talking about English   
   >>> identity, heritage or cultural continuity? Very bad indeed: do not   
   >>> pass Go, do not collect £200, go directly to Prevent.   
   >>>   
   >>> The effect is, to say the least, unsubtle. To question mass   
   >>> immigration, to care about national identity, to simply wonder about   
   >>> the merits of multiculturalism, is to place yourself on a conveyor   
   >>> belt towards extremism. Every Charlie is a potential fascist in the   
   >>> eyes of East Yorkshire educationalists.   
   >>>   
   >>> This is where Amelia comes in. She appears in one of the early   
   >>> scenarios as Charlie’s friend: outspoken, political, sceptical of   
   >>> immigration, interested in protests and nationalist groups. Within   
   >>> the logic of Pathways, she’s a warning sign. Stay away from the fash-   
   >>> adjacent temptress.   
   >>>   
   >>> The problem is that Amelia does not look like a Nazi villain. She   
   >>> looks intriguing. She has purple hair, a black BDSM-y choker and a   
   >>> goth girl aesthetic.   
   >>>   
   >>> For more than a decade, the goth or e-girl archetype has been one of   
   >>> the most consistently adored figures in online meme culture, from the   
   >>> ‘Big Tiddy Goth GF’ to the Doomer Girl. These characters are almost   
   >>> always sympathetic, desirable, aspirational, sexy. They signify non-   
   >>> conformity, authenticity and resistance.   
   >>>   
   >>> On 9 January, the game escaped containment and went viral.   
   >>> Screenshots from it began circulating on X. The tone was ironic   
   >>> admiration – ‘Wait, they made the cute goth girl the racist?’ – but   
   >>> irony quickly melted into something warmer and more mischievous.   
   >>> Amelia became an object of playful devotion, deliberate provocation   
   >>> and delicious eroticism.   
   >>>   
   >>> Fan art followed. AI-generated images and videos placed her in front   
   >>> of Big Ben, in English pubs, wrapped in Union Flags, laughing at Keir   
   >>> Starmer (‘How did we go from Churchill to you, you git?’), and   
   >>> leaping into a Spitfire to stop boats in the Channel. She was recast   
   >>> not as a cautionary figure, but as a symbol of exactly the sentiments   
   >>> the game was trying to suppress.   
   >>>   
   >>> To get mildly pretentious, what happened was détournement in the   
   >>> Situationist sense: an institutional message hijacked and turned   
   >>> against itself. A state-funded warning against nationalism became a   
   >>> nationalist icon. The sign was turned upside down.   
   >>>   
   >>> The authorities then made it all worse. Rather than owning and   
   >>> acknowledging the failure, they took the game offline. Links stopped   
   >>> working. The Amelia scenario became less accessible. What might have   
   >>> remained a niche embarrassment became a cause célèbre. The removal   
   >>> itself became proof, in the eyes of Amelia’s admirers, that the state   
   >>> was frightened of its own creation. Consequently, Amelia did not   
   >>> disappear. Go on X, Facebook, TikTok or many other internet sites and   
   >>> you will find Amelia doing all sorts of politically incorrect things.   
   >>> Her purple-haired rebellion has also been covered by Die Welt and the   
   >>> Guardian and birthed copy-cat equivalents across Europe and beyond.   
   >>>   
   >>> https://twitter.com/AmeliajakSolana/status/2015939362605629846?s=20   
   >>>   
   >>> Does it mean anything important, or is it all just amusing internet   
   >>> froth? I believe it does have significance, even if Amelia disappears   
   >>> tomorrow. Amelia is final proof, in the age of the viral AI meme,   
   >>> that the government no longer has any chance of controlling the   
   >>> narrative, let alone establishing one in the first place.   
   >>>   
   >>> This goes against every instinct and reflex of the British   
   >>> Establishment. Because, if the Establishment exists to do anything,   
   >>> it is to control us. This is why Starmer is so desperate to ban X for   
   >>> putting fake bikinis on women, while taking a year to announce a   
   >>> possible inquiry into nationwide grooming gangs.   
   >>>   
   >>> Happily, this is one battle the Establishment simply cannot win. It   
   >>> has been said that the internet is the subconscious of humanity. And,   
   >>> as Freud observed, in the end the subconscious will always decide   
   >>> what we do. Dreams denote desires, and desires determine reality. In   
   >>> other words: go, Amelia.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Sean Thomas   
   >>  >   
   >> "I love England!" - Amelia   
   >   
   > Clearly subversive.   
   >   
   "Tis strange, but true; for Truth is always strange; stranger than   
   fiction." - Byron   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca