Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.buddha.short.fat.guy    |    Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism    |    155,846 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 154,475 of 155,846    |
|    Dude to Wilson    |
|    Re: Amelia: the purple-haired goth girl     |
|    31 Jan 26 09:28:08    |
      From: punditster@gmail.com              On 1/31/2026 8:25 AM, Wilson wrote:       > On 1/30/2026 6:21 PM, Dude wrote:       >> On 1/30/2026 1:08 PM, Julian wrote:       >>> It has been obvious for some time that there are basic concepts that       >>> the liberal British Establishment simply does not understand. Like       >>> money. Or tax. Or business. Or going to the pub. Or the fundamental       >>> value of free speech.       >>>       >>> Well, now we can add a whole new roster of more baroque concepts to       >>> this list: meme culture, e-girls, semiotics, détournement, the       >>> subtext of black chokers and basic human nature. And all because of a       >>> purple- haired young cartoon woman called Amelia.       >>>       >>> Before we get to Amelia, we need to understand what created her –       >>> because the joke can only be grasped once you appreciate the lunacy       >>> that came before her minxy pink dresses. Amelia comes from a game       >>> called Pathways: Navigating Gaming, the Internet and Extremism. It       >>> was developed last year by local authorities in East Yorkshire with       >>> public money as part of the Prevent anti-radicalisation programme.       >>> Ostensibly, it was an educational tool for schoolchildren and college       >>> students.       >>>       >>> The player starts as ‘Charlie’, a new student trying to settle into       >>> college life. Charlie seems to be gender-fluid and is referred to       >>> throughout as ‘they/them’. And poor old Charlie’s task is to learn       >>> what kind of thinking is officially permitted.       >>>       >>> The game is simple. Certain actions are ‘good’; others are ‘bad’.       >>> Make too many bad choices and you are, within the logic of the game,       >>> deemed radicalised. Looking up immigration statistics? Bad.       >>> Expressing concern about job competition? Bad. Watching videos that       >>> criticise government immigration policy? Bad. Talking about English       >>> identity, heritage or cultural continuity? Very bad indeed: do not       >>> pass Go, do not collect £200, go directly to Prevent.       >>>       >>> The effect is, to say the least, unsubtle. To question mass       >>> immigration, to care about national identity, to simply wonder about       >>> the merits of multiculturalism, is to place yourself on a conveyor       >>> belt towards extremism. Every Charlie is a potential fascist in the       >>> eyes of East Yorkshire educationalists.       >>>       >>> This is where Amelia comes in. She appears in one of the early       >>> scenarios as Charlie’s friend: outspoken, political, sceptical of       >>> immigration, interested in protests and nationalist groups. Within       >>> the logic of Pathways, she’s a warning sign. Stay away from the fash-       >>> adjacent temptress.       >>>       >>> The problem is that Amelia does not look like a Nazi villain. She       >>> looks intriguing. She has purple hair, a black BDSM-y choker and a       >>> goth girl aesthetic.       >>>       >>> For more than a decade, the goth or e-girl archetype has been one of       >>> the most consistently adored figures in online meme culture, from the       >>> ‘Big Tiddy Goth GF’ to the Doomer Girl. These characters are almost       >>> always sympathetic, desirable, aspirational, sexy. They signify non-       >>> conformity, authenticity and resistance.       >>>       >>> On 9 January, the game escaped containment and went viral.       >>> Screenshots from it began circulating on X. The tone was ironic       >>> admiration – ‘Wait, they made the cute goth girl the racist?’ – but       >>> irony quickly melted into something warmer and more mischievous.       >>> Amelia became an object of playful devotion, deliberate provocation       >>> and delicious eroticism.       >>>       >>> Fan art followed. AI-generated images and videos placed her in front       >>> of Big Ben, in English pubs, wrapped in Union Flags, laughing at Keir       >>> Starmer (‘How did we go from Churchill to you, you git?’), and       >>> leaping into a Spitfire to stop boats in the Channel. She was recast       >>> not as a cautionary figure, but as a symbol of exactly the sentiments       >>> the game was trying to suppress.       >>>       >>> To get mildly pretentious, what happened was détournement in the       >>> Situationist sense: an institutional message hijacked and turned       >>> against itself. A state-funded warning against nationalism became a       >>> nationalist icon. The sign was turned upside down.       >>>       >>> The authorities then made it all worse. Rather than owning and       >>> acknowledging the failure, they took the game offline. Links stopped       >>> working. The Amelia scenario became less accessible. What might have       >>> remained a niche embarrassment became a cause célèbre. The removal       >>> itself became proof, in the eyes of Amelia’s admirers, that the state       >>> was frightened of its own creation. Consequently, Amelia did not       >>> disappear. Go on X, Facebook, TikTok or many other internet sites and       >>> you will find Amelia doing all sorts of politically incorrect things.       >>> Her purple-haired rebellion has also been covered by Die Welt and the       >>> Guardian and birthed copy-cat equivalents across Europe and beyond.       >>>       >>> https://twitter.com/AmeliajakSolana/status/2015939362605629846?s=20       >>>       >>> Does it mean anything important, or is it all just amusing internet       >>> froth? I believe it does have significance, even if Amelia disappears       >>> tomorrow. Amelia is final proof, in the age of the viral AI meme,       >>> that the government no longer has any chance of controlling the       >>> narrative, let alone establishing one in the first place.       >>>       >>> This goes against every instinct and reflex of the British       >>> Establishment. Because, if the Establishment exists to do anything,       >>> it is to control us. This is why Starmer is so desperate to ban X for       >>> putting fake bikinis on women, while taking a year to announce a       >>> possible inquiry into nationwide grooming gangs.       >>>       >>> Happily, this is one battle the Establishment simply cannot win. It       >>> has been said that the internet is the subconscious of humanity. And,       >>> as Freud observed, in the end the subconscious will always decide       >>> what we do. Dreams denote desires, and desires determine reality. In       >>> other words: go, Amelia.       >>>       >>>       >>> Sean Thomas       >> >       >> "I love England!" - Amelia       >       > Clearly subversive.       >       "Tis strange, but true; for Truth is always strange; stranger than       fiction." - Byron              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca