XPost: alt.messianic   
   From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   On 1/31/26 10:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   > On 1/31/2026 1:42 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >> On 1/31/26 8:36 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>> On 1/30/2026 4:46 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>> On 1/30/26 7:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 02:11:00 -0800, dart200   
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> we finally invented a type of good that has a zero-cost to copy,   
   >>>>>> and we   
   >>>>>> still can't seem to figure out how to build a production system where   
   >>>>>> all the products are freely distributed, cause we're so concerned   
   >>>>>> about   
   >>>>>> getting payment upfront   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So there you have it. This is why commercialism always fails.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> bruh i'm talking about digital goods that are zero-cost to copy   
   >>>>   
   >>>> real goods aren't the same,   
   >>>>   
   >>>> tho i might suggest we break out design vs production costs   
   >>>> requiring that the consumer pay production price upfront ... while   
   >>>> the design portion can be paid back as the consumer feels warranted   
   >>>>   
   >>>> this is moving more towards a gifting economy while dealing with the   
   >>>> reality that production has actual sunk costs   
   >>>>   
   >>>> i mean in the future maybe we will have the energy availability and   
   >>>> labor efficiency to totally transcend markets entirely, but i don't   
   >>>> feel we're ready for such a stage   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Everything must be paid for because we all must pay each other for   
   >>>>> what others do for us with few exceptions. The system depends on us   
   >>>>> all doing that.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> this especially fucks up computing. 99.99% of the industry has   
   >>>> devolved into bullshit work that is not actually economically   
   >>>> beneficial. but people need to get paid, and markets just don't have   
   >>>> the capability to select for universal solutions to problems like we   
   >>>> ought to be implementing with computing (since they rely on   
   >>>> competition and therefor competing systems/standards)   
   >>>>   
   >>>> computing systems are far more like governing systems than real   
   >>>> goods production and we haven't collectively recognized that reality   
   >>>> yet   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The fault that devolves from that is that some of us get more pay than   
   >>>>> others, have more status than others, live apart from us in mansions,   
   >>>>> work apart from us in skyscrapers in corner offices, so we have no   
   >>>>> access to, never even see those people as far as we know. These are   
   >>>>> the people who make the decisions in society. Their separateness from   
   >>>>> us means that they are never held accountable for bad self serving   
   >>>>> decisions.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> When shit comes down, the blame goes to the person who enforces those   
   >>>>> decisions, not to the decider. The enforcer is thrown under the bus,   
   >>>>> quietly goes away, is fired or moved elsewhere. In rare cases, maybe   
   >>>>> even get some jail time. But the decision stands.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And the rest of us are powerless. Why can't things be different? '   
   >>>>> 1) because those who have the power like having power, will not allow   
   >>>>> things to be different.   
   >>>>> 2) because the rest of us like it that way too. We are powerless, but   
   >>>>> we are also blameless. The guy in the corner office at the top of a   
   >>>>> skyscraper did it, not us.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Too radical? Of course it is, because this is the way things have   
   >>>>> always been, since humans stopped being hunter gatherers. This is how   
   >>>>> we know how to be.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> it's silly and entirely anti-consumer. it doesn't cost anything to   
   >>>>>> grant   
   >>>>>> a consumer access to the digital good, let them have the   
   >>>>>> experience and   
   >>>>>> decide after if it warrants payment for the experience. and for   
   >>>>>> continued development by creator. this will create a better feedback   
   >>>>>> system where people only pay for products they value after they   
   >>>>>> had the   
   >>>>>> experience, not before...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> will some people cheat the system??? i guess, but that already   
   >>>>>> happens,   
   >>>>>> and we end up with a worse feedback system where people have to pay   
   >>>>>> speculatively upfront for the experience rather than paying back   
   >>>>>> for an   
   >>>>>> experience they valued enough to voluntarily pay for   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> never mind all the DRM and platform locking bull crap that just   
   >>>>>> wastes   
   >>>>>> everyone's time with utter nonsense   
   >>>>   
   >>>> you know what will make the rest of us not powerless noah?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> > consolidating our voice by committed consensus making   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > #god   
   >>>>   
   >>>> something the rich are wholly incapable of doing even among   
   >>>> themselves since they've mostly been selected and filtered by late   
   >>>> stage hyper capitalism, so tbh they're powerless to set up a   
   >>>> competing system of consensus making. that's so far off their radar   
   >>>> they can't even imagine it coming 🤡🌎   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> "Late stage capitalism"   
   >>>   
   >>> https://i.redd.it/6pz3jus402jc1.jpeg   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> that's because it is   
   >>   
   >> do u think giving the global masses a voice, the 90% of the global   
   >> population the lives off sub $20/day, would use that voice to support   
   >> the grossly oppressive and inequitable system of property rights as it   
   >> stands???   
   >>   
   >> > 😂😂😂   
   >> >   
   >> > #god   
   >>   
   >   
   > People are not the same everywhere. The sub-saharan is vastly different   
   > in outlook and ethics from the western.   
      
   they are however, quite poor. and they all know it   
      
   >   
   > To give them a voice in what we can do here is profoundly ignorant and   
   > self-destructive. Suicidal even.   
      
   imagine an american preaching against free speech   
      
   --   
   hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|