Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.buddha.short.fat.guy    |    Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism    |    155,846 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 154,563 of 155,846    |
|    Dude to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Tech_barons_are_warning_    |
|    02 Feb 26 09:59:38    |
      From: punditster@gmail.com              On 2/1/2026 4:35 PM, dart200 wrote:       > On 2/1/26 9:03 AM, Wilson wrote:       >> On 1/31/2026 4:44 PM, Dude wrote:       >>> On 1/31/2026 10:30 AM, dart200 wrote:       >>>> because billionaires don't have morals, and are slave to chasing       >>>> what they perceive as profit regardless of the effect of others       >>>>       >>>> there's a reason rich people can't make it into heaven       >>>>       >>>> cause we can't even build heaven when rich people exist       >>>>       >>> Because it's obvious that you are biased by even using the term "rich".       >>> There's a good reason people don't want to be equally poor.       >>       >> By global standards everyone here is rich.       >>       >> If there were somehow a sudden great leveling of worldwide wealth today       >       > easy to say when ur not poor       >       The term “Democratic Socialism” is a contradiction in words:              IF              the idea of democracy embodies the liberal ideals of self-direction,       enabling ordinary people to meaningfully choose the policies that will       rule them,              THEN              Self-expression, and democracy pose an insurmountable problem for socialism.              ELSE              The State.        >              >> it would almost certainly result in the end of our civilization. Any       >> actual progress towards the improvement of living standards has always       >> come from innovation, which requires a degree of concentration of       >       > which modern govts did best in the 20th century...       >       > govts fund the riskiest innovation that private investors can't       >       >> wealth. Long-term overall improvement has never resulted from forced       >> redistribution.       >>       >> That doesn't mean we shouldn't help other people who need it. It does       >> however seem pretty obvious to me that assistance should never be from       >> any sort of centralized coercion.       >>       >> Forced redistribution is regressive and not progressive.       >       > capitalism is already predicated on forced distribution       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca