From: fedora@fea.st
On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 13:31:24 -0800, Dude wrote:
>On 2/3/2026 4:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 11:41:48 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/3/2026 10:07 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 2/3/26 10:05 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>> On 2/2/2026 11:14 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> u built a house on a parcel of land and now everyone in the entire world
>>>>>> is just supposed to respect that because???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you used resources that no one produced (land, raw material) and
>>>>>> is therefore yours by right of violence indefinitely into the future???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> what is reality just a giant game of finders keepers???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> u have no problem with landlords, why in the fuck do u have a problem
>>>>>> with landlords submissive to democratic input???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it's always such a weird contradiction libertarians display: no problem
>>>>>> with "private" landlords, but all the problems with "public"
>>>>>> landlords...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i'm arguing with submature children tbh, freaking boomernomics
>>>>>>
>>>>>> could we get a little general decency up in this bitch???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #god
>>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you, Nick, for addressing this matter of property rights and
>>>>> home ownership.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe you've not thought this through.
>>>>>
>>>>> You own your self, ownership of your own mind and body. Private
>>>>> property is morally grounded in the right to own one's own body, which
>>>>> extends to the fruits of one's labor.
>>>>
>>>> u are not ur property
>>>>
>>> You own your own body and mind, Nick. Your health is your greatest
>>> wealth. It's all yours. You have a right to the fruits of your labor.
>>> Otherwise, you are a slave - the property of others.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise, Nick, in reality you are owned - homeless.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's for your own protection - from coercion and allow you to make
>>>>> independent decisions, providing the security needed to live, work,
>>>>> and pursue your own happiness.
>>>>
>>>> yeah except most of the world is heavily limited by the rights of
>>>> others, and the situation is getting worse by the year
>>>>
>>> Obviously, ownership promotes responsible stewardship of resources and
>>> acts as a barrier against violating the rights of others. Your property
>>> is your protection.
>>
>> Repeating this assertion does not answer objections raised to it.
>>
>What planet are you living on? I thought you said you went to college.
>
>"You own your own body you have an inherent right to the fruit of your
>own labor." - John Locke
>
>So, let me be clear:
>
>Under communism, you don't own anything, and you do not keep "the fruit
>of your labor", since it has to go to other people that need it.
>
>Under the communist notion of freedom you are not free, you have no say
>on what to do with the food or shelter you're producing because it has
>to go to the State, to be distributed to other people.
If that were true, then the fruits of their labor would also be
distributed to you, which would be an enormous profit over what little
bit you put in the pot.
But it is not true.
This is not true:
>food or shelter you're producing because it has
>to go to the State, to be distributed to other people.
> >
>>> So, let's be clear.
>>>
>>> Private property is a natural right: when you put labor in with nature,
>>> resources can be removed from the common state of nature and can be shared.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> All creatures, large and small, have homes where they go and reflect
>>>>> on their good fortune. Home is where your stuff is.
>>
>> Not this either.
--
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<>> to <<>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
