From: punditster@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/5/2026 4:23 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   > On 2/5/26 9:32 AM, Dude wrote:   
   >> On 2/4/2026 10:58 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>> On 2/4/26 10:56 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>> On 2/4/26 6:52 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2/4/2026 2:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 13:31:24 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 4:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 11:41:48 -0800, Dude    
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 10:07 AM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/26 10:05 AM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/2/2026 11:14 AM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> u built a house on a parcel of land and now everyone in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> entire world   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> is just supposed to respect that because???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> you used resources that no one produced (land, raw material)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> is therefore yours by right of violence indefinitely into   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> the future???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> what is reality just a giant game of finders keepers???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> u have no problem with landlords, why in the fuck do u have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> a problem   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> with landlords submissive to democratic input???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> it's always such a weird contradiction libertarians display:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> no problem   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> with "private" landlords, but all the problems with "public"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> landlords...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> i'm arguing with submature children tbh, freaking boomernomics   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> could we get a little general decency up in this bitch???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> #god   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, Nick, for addressing this matter of property   
   >>>>>>>>>>> rights and   
   >>>>>>>>>>> home ownership.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you've not thought this through.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> You own your self, ownership of your own mind and body. Private   
   >>>>>>>>>>> property is morally grounded in the right to own one's own   
   >>>>>>>>>>> body, which   
   >>>>>>>>>>> extends to the fruits of one's labor.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> u are not ur property   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> You own your own body and mind, Nick. Your health is your greatest   
   >>>>>>>>> wealth. It's all yours. You have a right to the fruits of your   
   >>>>>>>>> labor.   
   >>>>>>>>> Otherwise, you are a slave - the property of others.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, Nick, in reality you are owned - homeless.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> It's for your own protection - from coercion and allow you to   
   >>>>>>>>>>> make   
   >>>>>>>>>>> independent decisions, providing the security needed to live,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> work,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> and pursue your own happiness.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> yeah except most of the world is heavily limited by the rights of   
   >>>>>>>>>> others, and the situation is getting worse by the year   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Obviously, ownership promotes responsible stewardship of   
   >>>>>>>>> resources and   
   >>>>>>>>> acts as a barrier against violating the rights of others. Your   
   >>>>>>>>> property   
   >>>>>>>>> is your protection.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Repeating this assertion does not answer objections raised to it.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> What planet are you living on? I thought you said you went to   
   >>>>>>> college.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "You own your own body you have an inherent right to the fruit of   
   >>>>>>> your   
   >>>>>>> own labor." - John Locke   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> So, let me be clear:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Under communism, you don't own anything, and you do not keep "the   
   >>>>>>> fruit   
   >>>>>>> of your labor", since it has to go to other people that need it.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Under the communist notion of freedom you are not free, you have   
   >>>>>>> no say   
   >>>>>>> on what to do with the food or shelter you're producing because   
   >>>>>>> it has   
   >>>>>>> to go to the State, to be distributed to other people.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> If that were true, then the fruits of their labor would also be   
   >>>>>> distributed to you, which would be an enormous profit over what   
   >>>>>> little   
   >>>>>> bit you put in the pot.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> That's where the problem is - there's no incentive to work hard, or   
   >>>>> work at all, when you get on the State dole. The same low   
   >>>>> subsistence level as everyone else, forever poor, owned by the State.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You already know this is state capitalism, right?, right.   
   >>>>>  >   
   >>>>>> But it is not true.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> This is not true:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> This is nuts! Where's Creon?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> All creatures great and small are entitled to their own body.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> body rights do not extend to property   
   >>>>   
   >>>> property rights do not extend to ur body   
   >>>>   
   >>>> they are different things   
   >>>   
   >>> to say they are the same thing is a category error   
   >>>   
   >> Thanks for bringing this to our attention, Nick!   
   >>   
   >> Now, if you could just learn grammer. Thanks again!   
   >   
   > ad hominem / red herring   
   >   
   Also, maybe you could learn how to spell and write in English. You'll   
   need skills like that filling out your resume. You know they're reading   
   this down at Kelly Girls.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)