From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   On 2/5/26 5:43 PM, Dude wrote:   
   > On 2/5/2026 4:22 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >> On 2/5/26 6:01 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 22:58:48 -0800, dart200   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 2/4/26 10:56 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2/4/26 6:52 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2/4/2026 2:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 13:31:24 -0800, Dude    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 4:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 11:41:48 -0800, Dude    
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 10:07 AM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/26 10:05 AM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/2/2026 11:14 AM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> u built a house on a parcel of land and now everyone in the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> entire world   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> is just supposed to respect that because???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> you used resources that no one produced (land, raw   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> material) and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> is therefore yours by right of violence indefinitely into the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> future???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> what is reality just a giant game of finders keepers???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> u have no problem with landlords, why in the fuck do u have a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> problem   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> with landlords submissive to democratic input???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> it's always such a weird contradiction libertarians   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> display: no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> problem   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> with "private" landlords, but all the problems with "public"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> landlords...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> i'm arguing with submature children tbh, freaking boomernomics   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> could we get a little general decency up in this bitch???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> #god   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, Nick, for addressing this matter of property   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> rights and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> home ownership.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you've not thought this through.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> You own your self, ownership of your own mind and body. Private   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> property is morally grounded in the right to own one's own   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> body,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> which   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> extends to the fruits of one's labor.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> u are not ur property   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> You own your own body and mind, Nick. Your health is your   
   >>>>>>>>>> greatest   
   >>>>>>>>>> wealth. It's all yours. You have a right to the fruits of your   
   >>>>>>>>>> labor.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, you are a slave - the property of others.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, Nick, in reality you are owned - homeless.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> It's for your own protection - from coercion and allow you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> to make   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> independent decisions, providing the security needed to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> live, work,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> and pursue your own happiness.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> yeah except most of the world is heavily limited by the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> rights of   
   >>>>>>>>>>> others, and the situation is getting worse by the year   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Obviously, ownership promotes responsible stewardship of   
   >>>>>>>>>> resources   
   >>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>> acts as a barrier against violating the rights of others. Your   
   >>>>>>>>>> property   
   >>>>>>>>>> is your protection.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Repeating this assertion does not answer objections raised to it.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> What planet are you living on? I thought you said you went to   
   >>>>>>>> college.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "You own your own body you have an inherent right to the fruit   
   >>>>>>>> of your   
   >>>>>>>> own labor." - John Locke   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So, let me be clear:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Under communism, you don't own anything, and you do not keep   
   >>>>>>>> "the fruit   
   >>>>>>>> of your labor", since it has to go to other people that need it.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Under the communist notion of freedom you are not free, you have   
   >>>>>>>> no say   
   >>>>>>>> on what to do with the food or shelter you're producing because   
   >>>>>>>> it has   
   >>>>>>>> to go to the State, to be distributed to other people.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> If that were true, then the fruits of their labor would also be   
   >>>>>>> distributed to you, which would be an enormous profit over what   
   >>>>>>> little   
   >>>>>>> bit you put in the pot.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> That's where the problem is - there's no incentive to work hard, or   
   >>>>>> work at all, when you get on the State dole. The same low subsistence   
   >>>>>> level as everyone else, forever poor, owned by the State.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You already know this is state capitalism, right?, right.   
   >>>>>>   >   
   >>>>>>> But it is not true.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> This is not true:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> This is nuts! Where's Creon?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> All creatures great and small are entitled to their own body.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> body rights do not extend to property   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> property rights do not extend to ur body   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> they are different things   
   >>>>   
   >>>> to say they are the same thing is a category error   
   >>>   
   >>> What is it when they say the same thing over and over?   
   >>   
   >> repetition fallacy   
   >>   
   > Let's just be clear and transparent. Noah is a boomer and you're the new   
   > kid on the block   
      
   ok boomer   
      
   --   
   hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)