From: punditster@gmail.com
On 2/5/2026 6:31 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2026 17:27:12 -0800, Dude wrote:
>
>> On 2/5/2026 1:06 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>> On Thu, 5 Feb 2026 11:49:49 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/4/2026 10:58 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 2/4/26 10:56 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/4/26 6:52 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/4/2026 2:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 13:31:24 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 4:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 11:41:48 -0800, Dude
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 10:07 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/26 10:05 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/2/2026 11:14 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> u built a house on a parcel of land and now everyone in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> entire world
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just supposed to respect that because???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you used resources that no one produced (land, raw material) and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is therefore yours by right of violence indefinitely into the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> future???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what is reality just a giant game of finders keepers???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> u have no problem with landlords, why in the fuck do u have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with landlords submissive to democratic input???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's always such a weird contradiction libertarians display:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no problem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with "private" landlords, but all the problems with "public"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> landlords...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i'm arguing with submature children tbh, freaking boomernomics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could we get a little general decency up in this bitch???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #god
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, Nick, for addressing this matter of property rights
and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> home ownership.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you've not thought this through.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You own your self, ownership of your own mind and body. Private
>>>>>>>>>>>>> property is morally grounded in the right to own one's own
>>>>>>>>>>>>> body, which
>>>>>>>>>>>>> extends to the fruits of one's labor.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> u are not ur property
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You own your own body and mind, Nick. Your health is your greatest
>>>>>>>>>>> wealth. It's all yours. You have a right to the fruits of your
>>>>>>>>>>> labor.
>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, you are a slave - the property of others.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, Nick, in reality you are owned - homeless.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's for your own protection - from coercion and allow you to
make
>>>>>>>>>>>>> independent decisions, providing the security needed to live,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> work,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and pursue your own happiness.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> yeah except most of the world is heavily limited by the rights of
>>>>>>>>>>>> others, and the situation is getting worse by the year
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously, ownership promotes responsible stewardship of
>>>>>>>>>>> resources and
>>>>>>>>>>> acts as a barrier against violating the rights of others. Your
>>>>>>>>>>> property
>>>>>>>>>>> is your protection.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Repeating this assertion does not answer objections raised to it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What planet are you living on? I thought you said you went to
college.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "You own your own body you have an inherent right to the fruit of
your
>>>>>>>>> own labor." - John Locke
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, let me be clear:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Under communism, you don't own anything, and you do not keep "the
>>>>>>>>> fruit
>>>>>>>>> of your labor", since it has to go to other people that need it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Under the communist notion of freedom you are not free, you have no
>>>>>>>>> say
>>>>>>>>> on what to do with the food or shelter you're producing because it
has
>>>>>>>>> to go to the State, to be distributed to other people.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If that were true, then the fruits of their labor would also be
>>>>>>>> distributed to you, which would be an enormous profit over what little
>>>>>>>> bit you put in the pot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's where the problem is - there's no incentive to work hard, or
>>>>>>> work at all, when you get on the State dole. The same low subsistence
>>>>>>> level as everyone else, forever poor, owned by the State.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You already know this is state capitalism, right?, right.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> But it is not true.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is not true:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is nuts! Where's Creon?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All creatures great and small are entitled to their own body.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> body rights do not extend to property
>>>>>>
>>>>>> property rights do not extend to ur body
>>>>>>
>>>>>> they are different things
>>>>>
>>>>> to say they are the same thing is a category error
>>>>>
>>>> The phrase "all men are created equal" is in the preamble to the U.S.
>>>> Declaration of Independence. Drafted by Thomas Jefferson and adopted by
>>>> the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, it asserts that people are
>>>> endowed with unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
>>>> happiness.
>>>
>>> Where does in mention property rights? Come on spare us your twisted
>>> definitions.
>>>
>> Are you sure you passed High School US Government class?
>>
>> The Fifth Amendment explicitly states that no person shall be "deprived
>> of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."
>
> So now you might want to argue about what constitutes due process.
>
With someone that failed to pass Government in High School?
>
You
> do know that whole thing is meant to finance new cars and big houses
> for lawyers.
>
Not entirely sure you didn't just make that up.
>
> And the one with the most expensive lawyer wins.
>
Pretty sure you made that up.
> >> There's a thought, so you'll never be able to say I'm sorry.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
