Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.buddha.short.fat.guy    |    Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism    |    155,846 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 154,734 of 155,846    |
|    dart200 to Wilson    |
|    Re: on freaking boomernomics    |
|    06 Feb 26 10:29:39    |
      From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid              On 2/6/26 10:18 AM, Wilson wrote:       > On 2/5/2026 10:50 PM, dart200 wrote:       >> On 2/5/26 6:07 PM, Dude wrote:       >>> On 2/5/2026 4:30 PM, dart200 wrote:       >>>> On 2/5/26 9:30 AM, Dude wrote:       >>>>> On 2/4/2026 10:56 PM, dart200 wrote:       >>>>>>       >>>>>> body rights do not extend to property       >>>>>>       >>>>> Your body is your property, you own it.       >>>>       >>>> negative, u do not "own" your body, you *are* your body       >>>>       >>> You can't force me to get a COVID shot. Where did you get that crazy       >>> idea, Nick?       >>>> u cannot sell ur whole body to another owner like you can with       >>>> property,       >>>> therefor the rights are very much distinct.       >>>>       >>> Your body is your body. You own it. You have a right to self defense.       >>> Don't let them take your body, Nick. It's your mind too. Don't get       >>> brainwashed into thinking you have no human rights.       >>       >> i have *human rights*, and because i *am* my body, my body has those       >> rights as well and *i* am inseparable from *my body*       >>       >> ownership rights are not needed for my body because i and my body all       >> have human rights...       >>       >> property/ownershp rights are for property, the fact there is some       >> overlap kinda, does not then imply they are the same things.       >>       >> that's a *false equivalence*, and ultimately just liberal nonsense       >> trying to pathetically justify the continued use of coercive capitalism       >       > First off, coercive capitalism is not a real thing.              nigga u dumb if u think captialism could stand not having a massive       legal system enforcing adherence to property norms              >       > The concept of self-ownership, the idea that individuals have exclusive       > moral and legal control over their own bodies, is a foundational ethical       > and legal principle.       >       > You have rights to bodily integrity, autonomy, and inviolability. This       > is the basis for prohibitions on assault, battery, and non-consensual       > medical treatment.       >       > Legally property rights don't extend to one's body, but in a deeper       > moral sense the principle of self-ownership treats the body as the       > original and most fundamental "property" an individual possesses.       >       > Individuals own themselves because they own their labor, and the body is       > the instrument of labor. Or as John Locke said, "Every man has a       > property in his own person". This is the foundation for all rights to       > external objects. And it's the idea that underpins all of modern human       > rights theory.       >              i will never agree that childish first come first serve "muh labor"       ethics in regards to utilizing land/resources is a good, let alone       sustainable, paradigm for society                     --       hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca