home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.buddha.short.fat.guy      Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism      155,846 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 154,734 of 155,846   
   dart200 to Wilson   
   Re: on freaking boomernomics   
   06 Feb 26 10:29:39   
   
   From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   On 2/6/26 10:18 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   > On 2/5/2026 10:50 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >> On 2/5/26 6:07 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>> On 2/5/2026 4:30 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>> On 2/5/26 9:30 AM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2/4/2026 10:56 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> body rights do not extend to property   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> Your body is your property, you own it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> negative, u do not "own" your body, you *are* your body   
   >>>>   
   >>> You can't force me to get a COVID shot. Where did you get that crazy   
   >>> idea, Nick?   
   >>>> u cannot sell ur whole body to another owner like you can with   
   >>>> property,   
   >>>> therefor the rights are very much distinct.   
   >>>>   
   >>> Your body is your body. You own it. You have a right to self defense.   
   >>> Don't let them take your body, Nick. It's your mind too. Don't get   
   >>> brainwashed into thinking you have no human rights.   
   >>   
   >> i have *human rights*, and because i *am* my body, my body has those   
   >> rights as well and *i* am inseparable from *my body*   
   >>   
   >> ownership rights are not needed for my body because i and my body all   
   >> have human rights...   
   >>   
   >> property/ownershp rights are for property, the fact there is some   
   >> overlap kinda, does not then imply they are the same things.   
   >>   
   >> that's a *false equivalence*, and ultimately just liberal nonsense   
   >> trying to pathetically justify the continued use of coercive capitalism   
   >   
   > First off, coercive capitalism is not a real thing.   
      
   nigga u dumb if u think captialism could stand not having a massive   
   legal system enforcing adherence to property norms   
      
   >   
   > The concept of self-ownership, the idea that individuals have exclusive   
   > moral and legal control over their own bodies, is a foundational ethical   
   > and legal principle.   
   >   
   > You have rights to bodily integrity, autonomy, and inviolability. This   
   > is the basis for prohibitions on assault, battery, and non-consensual   
   > medical treatment.   
   >   
   > Legally property rights don't extend to one's body, but in a deeper   
   > moral sense the principle of self-ownership treats the body as the   
   > original and most fundamental "property" an individual possesses.   
   >   
   > Individuals own themselves because they own their labor, and the body is   
   > the instrument of labor. Or as John Locke said, "Every man has a   
   > property in his own person". This is the foundation for all rights to   
   > external objects. And it's the idea that underpins all of modern human   
   > rights theory.   
   >   
      
   i will never agree that childish first come first serve "muh labor"   
   ethics in regards to utilizing land/resources is a good, let alone   
   sustainable, paradigm for society   
      
      
   --   
   hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca