From: punditster@gmail.com
On 2/5/2026 7:50 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 2/5/26 6:07 PM, Dude wrote:
>> On 2/5/2026 4:30 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 2/5/26 9:30 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>> On 2/4/2026 10:56 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 2/4/26 6:52 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/4/2026 2:04 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 13:31:24 -0800, Dude
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 4:20 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 11:41:48 -0800, Dude
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 10:07 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/26 10:05 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/2/2026 11:14 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> u built a house on a parcel of land and now everyone in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> entire world
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just supposed to respect that because???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you used resources that no one produced (land, raw
>>>>>>>>>>>>> material) and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is therefore yours by right of violence indefinitely into
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the future???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what is reality just a giant game of finders keepers???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> u have no problem with landlords, why in the fuck do u have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a problem
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with landlords submissive to democratic input???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's always such a weird contradiction libertarians
>>>>>>>>>>>>> display: no problem
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with "private" landlords, but all the problems with "public"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> landlords...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> i'm arguing with submature children tbh, freaking boomernomics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> could we get a little general decency up in this bitch???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #god
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, Nick, for addressing this matter of property
>>>>>>>>>>>> rights and
>>>>>>>>>>>> home ownership.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you've not thought this through.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You own your self, ownership of your own mind and body. Private
>>>>>>>>>>>> property is morally grounded in the right to own one's own
>>>>>>>>>>>> body, which
>>>>>>>>>>>> extends to the fruits of one's labor.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> u are not ur property
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You own your own body and mind, Nick. Your health is your
>>>>>>>>>> greatest
>>>>>>>>>> wealth. It's all yours. You have a right to the fruits of your
>>>>>>>>>> labor.
>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, you are a slave - the property of others.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, Nick, in reality you are owned - homeless.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's for your own protection - from coercion and allow you
>>>>>>>>>>>> to make
>>>>>>>>>>>> independent decisions, providing the security needed to
>>>>>>>>>>>> live, work,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and pursue your own happiness.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> yeah except most of the world is heavily limited by the
>>>>>>>>>>> rights of
>>>>>>>>>>> others, and the situation is getting worse by the year
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Obviously, ownership promotes responsible stewardship of
>>>>>>>>>> resources and
>>>>>>>>>> acts as a barrier against violating the rights of others. Your
>>>>>>>>>> property
>>>>>>>>>> is your protection.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Repeating this assertion does not answer objections raised to it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What planet are you living on? I thought you said you went to
>>>>>>>> college.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "You own your own body you have an inherent right to the fruit
>>>>>>>> of your
>>>>>>>> own labor." - John Locke
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, let me be clear:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Under communism, you don't own anything, and you do not keep
>>>>>>>> "the fruit
>>>>>>>> of your labor", since it has to go to other people that need it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Under the communist notion of freedom you are not free, you have
>>>>>>>> no say
>>>>>>>> on what to do with the food or shelter you're producing because
>>>>>>>> it has
>>>>>>>> to go to the State, to be distributed to other people.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If that were true, then the fruits of their labor would also be
>>>>>>> distributed to you, which would be an enormous profit over what
>>>>>>> little
>>>>>>> bit you put in the pot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's where the problem is - there's no incentive to work hard,
>>>>>> or work at all, when you get on the State dole. The same low
>>>>>> subsistence level as everyone else, forever poor, owned by the State.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You already know this is state capitalism, right?, right.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> But it is not true.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is not true:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is nuts! Where's Creon?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All creatures great and small are entitled to their own body.
>>>>>
>>>>> body rights do not extend to property
>>>>>
>>>> Your body is your property, you own it.
>>>
>>> negative, u do not "own" your body, you *are* your body
>>>
>> You can't force me to get a COVID shot. Where did you get that crazy
>> idea, Nick?
>> > > u cannot sell ur whole body to another owner like you can with
>> property,
>>> therefor the rights are very much distinct.
>>>
>> Your body is your body. You own it. You have a right to self defense.
>> Don't let them take your body, Nick. It's your mind too. Don't get
>> brainwashed into thinking you have no human rights.
>
> i have *human rights*, and because i *am* my body, my body has those
> rights as well and *i* am inseparable from *my body*
>
> ownership rights are not needed for my body because i and my body all
> have human rights...
>
> property/ownershp rights are for property, the fact there is some
> overlap kinda, does not then imply they are the same things.
>
> that's a *false equivalence*, and ultimately just liberal nonsense
> trying to pathetically justify the continued use of coercive capitalism
>
If you said that around here, someone might say, Dude, I will fuck you up!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
