Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.buddha.short.fat.guy    |    Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism    |    156,682 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 154,739 of 156,682    |
|    Wilson to All    |
|    Re: on freaking boomernomics    |
|    06 Feb 26 13:36:07    |
      From: Wilson@nowhere.invalid              On 2/6/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:       > On 2/6/26 10:18 AM, Wilson wrote:       >> On 2/5/2026 10:50 PM, dart200 wrote:       >>> On 2/5/26 6:07 PM, Dude wrote:       >>>> On 2/5/2026 4:30 PM, dart200 wrote:       >>>>> On 2/5/26 9:30 AM, Dude wrote:       >>>>>> On 2/4/2026 10:56 PM, dart200 wrote:       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> body rights do not extend to property       >>>>>>>       >>>>>> Your body is your property, you own it.       >>>>>       >>>>> negative, u do not "own" your body, you *are* your body       >>>>>       >>>> You can't force me to get a COVID shot. Where did you get that crazy       >>>> idea, Nick?       >>>>> u cannot sell ur whole body to another owner like you can with       >>>>> property,       >>>>> therefor the rights are very much distinct.       >>>>>       >>>> Your body is your body. You own it. You have a right to self       >>>> defense. Don't let them take your body, Nick. It's your mind too.       >>>> Don't get brainwashed into thinking you have no human rights.       >>>       >>> i have *human rights*, and because i *am* my body, my body has those       >>> rights as well and *i* am inseparable from *my body*       >>>       >>> ownership rights are not needed for my body because i and my body all       >>> have human rights...       >>>       >>> property/ownershp rights are for property, the fact there is some       >>> overlap kinda, does not then imply they are the same things.       >>>       >>> that's a *false equivalence*, and ultimately just liberal nonsense       >>> trying to pathetically justify the continued use of coercive capitalism       >>       >> First off, coercive capitalism is not a real thing.       >       > nigga u dumb if u think captialism could stand not having a massive       > legal system enforcing adherence to property norms              The legal system to enforce property norms is actually there to reduce       violence.              >> The concept of self-ownership, the idea that individuals have       >> exclusive moral and legal control over their own bodies, is a       >> foundational ethical and legal principle.       >>       >> You have rights to bodily integrity, autonomy, and inviolability. This       >> is the basis for prohibitions on assault, battery, and non-consensual       >> medical treatment.       >>       >> Legally property rights don't extend to one's body, but in a deeper       >> moral sense the principle of self-ownership treats the body as the       >> original and most fundamental "property" an individual possesses.       >>       >> Individuals own themselves because they own their labor, and the body       >> is the instrument of labor. Or as John Locke said, "Every man has a       >> property in his own person". This is the foundation for all rights to       >> external objects. And it's the idea that underpins all of modern human       >> rights theory.       >>       >       > i will never agree that childish first come first serve "muh labor"       > ethics in regards to utilizing land/resources is a good, let alone       > sustainable, paradigm for society              That's fine. Just don't encroach on other people's stuff and we'll be okay.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca