From: Wilson@nowhere.invalid   
      
   On 2/6/2026 2:57 PM, Dude wrote:   
   > On 2/6/2026 10:36 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >> On 2/6/2026 1:29 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>> On 2/6/26 10:18 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>> On 2/5/2026 10:50 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2/5/26 6:07 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2/5/2026 4:30 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 2/5/26 9:30 AM, Dude wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/4/2026 10:56 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> body rights do not extend to property   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Your body is your property, you own it.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> negative, u do not "own" your body, you *are* your body   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You can't force me to get a COVID shot. Where did you get that   
   >>>>>> crazy idea, Nick?   
   >>>>>>> u cannot sell ur whole body to another owner like you can with   
   >>>>>>> property,   
   >>>>>>> therefor the rights are very much distinct.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Your body is your body. You own it. You have a right to self   
   >>>>>> defense. Don't let them take your body, Nick. It's your mind too.   
   >>>>>> Don't get brainwashed into thinking you have no human rights.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> i have *human rights*, and because i *am* my body, my body has   
   >>>>> those rights as well and *i* am inseparable from *my body*   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> ownership rights are not needed for my body because i and my body   
   >>>>> all have human rights...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> property/ownershp rights are for property, the fact there is some   
   >>>>> overlap kinda, does not then imply they are the same things.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> that's a *false equivalence*, and ultimately just liberal nonsense   
   >>>>> trying to pathetically justify the continued use of coercive   
   >>>>> capitalism   
   >>>>   
   >>>> First off, coercive capitalism is not a real thing.   
   >>>   
   >>> nigga u dumb if u think captialism could stand not having a massive   
   >>> legal system enforcing adherence to property norms   
   >>   
   >> The legal system to enforce property norms is actually there to reduce   
   >> violence.   
   >>   
   >>>> The concept of self-ownership, the idea that individuals have   
   >>>> exclusive moral and legal control over their own bodies, is a   
   >>>> foundational ethical and legal principle.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You have rights to bodily integrity, autonomy, and inviolability.   
   >>>> This is the basis for prohibitions on assault, battery, and non-   
   >>>> consensual medical treatment.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Legally property rights don't extend to one's body, but in a deeper   
   >>>> moral sense the principle of self-ownership treats the body as the   
   >>>> original and most fundamental "property" an individual possesses.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Individuals own themselves because they own their labor, and the   
   >>>> body is the instrument of labor. Or as John Locke said, "Every man   
   >>>> has a property in his own person". This is the foundation for all   
   >>>> rights to external objects. And it's the idea that underpins all of   
   >>>> modern human rights theory.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> i will never agree that childish first come first serve "muh labor"   
   >>> ethics in regards to utilizing land/resources is a good, let alone   
   >>> sustainable, paradigm for society   
   >>   
   >> That's fine. Just don't encroach on other people's stuff and we'll be   
   >> okay.   
   >>   
   > It's for his own protection. Not sure if he can understand that.   
      
   smh!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)