From: punditster@gmail.com
On 2/6/2026 4:20 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 2/6/26 3:17 PM, Creon wrote:
>> At Fri, 6 Feb 2026 11:11:06 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/6/2026 10:51 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 12:24:47 -0500, Wilson
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/4/2026 12:23 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 11:19:01 -0500, Wilson
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 2:00 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 13:15:13 -0500, Wilson
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 1:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/26 10:05 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's for your own protection - from coercion and allow you to
>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>> independent decisions, providing the security needed to live,
>>>>>>>>>>> work,
>>>>>>>>>>> and pursue your own happiness.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> yeah except most of the world is heavily limited by the rights of
>>>>>>>>>> others, and the situation is getting worse by the year
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> People have been thinking about this stuff for centuries, and
>>>>>>>>> have come
>>>>>>>>> up with some neat ideas.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will
>>>>>>>>> within
>>>>>>>>> limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add
>>>>>>>>> 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the
>>>>>>>>> tyrant's
>>>>>>>>> will, and always so when it violates the rights of the
>>>>>>>>> individual."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Like when we drag "illegal" immigrants from their homes and ship
>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>> off to prison or some ugly place.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Breaking laws is like that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I seem to remember
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "I do not add
>>>>>>> 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's
>>>>>>> will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You did say that right?
>>>>>
>>>>> A nation is not just a patch of land, it's the people. Collectively
>>>>> those people have the ability and the responsibility to determine
>>>>> who is
>>>>> allowed to enter. Our current system chooses who makes the rules via
>>>>> election. Biden chose to ignore immigration law and allow millions to
>>>>> enter illegally. Trump has decided to actually enforce the law and has
>>>>> effectively ended illegal border crossings.
>>>>>
>>>>> TLDR: Illegal border jumpers have trespassed, and as such their
>>>>> right to
>>>>> be here is forfeit.
>>>>
>>>> You seem to have forgotten about that "law is the tyrant's will" part.
>>>> And furthermore
>>>>
>>>>> those people have the ability and the responsibility to determine
>>>>> who is allowed to enter.
>>>>
>>>> Himbo might have won a small majority in the election, but he did not
>>>> win a consensus. And so some of us feel it is our responsibility to
>>>> stand up and say, you do not speak or act for me, asshole.
>>> >
>>> It's not exactly clear if you have any United States rights. As an
>>> immigrant, you'd be biased in your opinion anyway. Are you familiar with
>>> the phrase "We the people..."?
>>
>> Listen you directly unto me:
>>
>> The U.S. Constitution is a _limit on government_. You find
>
> lol, lawyers have done away with such nonsense...
>
That sounds illegal. What time?
> > like what can't the feds regulate???
>The question is, who regulates the regulators?
There are three branches of the U.S. government: The legislative, which
makes laws; the executive, that enforces laws; and the judicial, which
interprets laws.
It's a string, so you can string things together when everything falls
apart.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
