From: fedora@fea.st
On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 18:27:42 -0800, Dude wrote:
>On 2/6/2026 4:20 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 2/6/26 3:17 PM, Creon wrote:
>>> At Fri, 6 Feb 2026 11:11:06 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/6/2026 10:51 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 12:24:47 -0500, Wilson
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/4/2026 12:23 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2026 11:19:01 -0500, Wilson
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 2:00 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 13:15:13 -0500, Wilson
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 1:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/26 10:05 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's for your own protection - from coercion and allow you to
>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>> independent decisions, providing the security needed to live,
>>>>>>>>>>>> work,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and pursue your own happiness.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> yeah except most of the world is heavily limited by the rights of
>>>>>>>>>>> others, and the situation is getting worse by the year
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> People have been thinking about this stuff for centuries, and
>>>>>>>>>> have come
>>>>>>>>>> up with some neat ideas.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will
>>>>>>>>>> within
>>>>>>>>>> limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add
>>>>>>>>>> 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the
>>>>>>>>>> tyrant's
>>>>>>>>>> will, and always so when it violates the rights of the
>>>>>>>>>> individual."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Like when we drag "illegal" immigrants from their homes and ship
>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>> off to prison or some ugly place.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Breaking laws is like that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I seem to remember
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "I do not add
>>>>>>>> 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's
>>>>>>>> will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You did say that right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A nation is not just a patch of land, it's the people. Collectively
>>>>>> those people have the ability and the responsibility to determine
>>>>>> who is
>>>>>> allowed to enter. Our current system chooses who makes the rules via
>>>>>> election. Biden chose to ignore immigration law and allow millions to
>>>>>> enter illegally. Trump has decided to actually enforce the law and has
>>>>>> effectively ended illegal border crossings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TLDR: Illegal border jumpers have trespassed, and as such their
>>>>>> right to
>>>>>> be here is forfeit.
>>>>>
>>>>> You seem to have forgotten about that "law is the tyrant's will" part.
>>>>> And furthermore
>>>>>
>>>>>> those people have the ability and the responsibility to determine
>>>>>> who is allowed to enter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Himbo might have won a small majority in the election, but he did not
>>>>> win a consensus. And so some of us feel it is our responsibility to
>>>>> stand up and say, you do not speak or act for me, asshole.
>>>> >
>>>> It's not exactly clear if you have any United States rights. As an
>>>> immigrant, you'd be biased in your opinion anyway. Are you familiar with
>>>> the phrase "We the people..."?
>>>
>>> Listen you directly unto me:
>>>
>>> The U.S. Constitution is a _limit on government_. You find
>>
>> lol, lawyers have done away with such nonsense...
>>
>That sounds illegal. What time?
> > > like what can't the feds regulate???
>>The question is, who regulates the regulators?
>
>There are three branches of the U.S. government: The legislative, which
>makes laws; the executive, that enforces laws; and the judicial, which
>interprets laws.
That is the way it used to work.
>It's a string, so you can string things together when everything falls
>apart.
--
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<>> to <<>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
