From: fedora@fea.st
On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 10:53:58 -0500, Wilson
wrote:
>On 2/6/2026 6:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 2/6/26 1:41 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 2/6/2026 2:33 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 2/6/26 10:33 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 2/6/2026 1:25 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/6/26 9:36 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/4/2026 3:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/3/26 10:15 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 1:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/26 10:05 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/2/2026 11:14 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> u built a house on a parcel of land and now everyone in the
>>>>>>>>>>>> entire world
>>>>>>>>>>>> is just supposed to respect that because???
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> you used resources that no one produced (land, raw material) and
>>>>>>>>>>>> is therefore yours by right of violence indefinitely into the
>>>>>>>>>>>> future???
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> what is reality just a giant game of finders keepers???
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> u have no problem with landlords, why in the fuck do u have a
>>>>>>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>>>>>>> with landlords submissive to democratic input???
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> it's always such a weird contradiction libertarians display:
>>>>>>>>>>>> no problem
>>>>>>>>>>>> with "private" landlords, but all the problems with "public"
>>>>>>>>>>>> landlords...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> i'm arguing with submature children tbh, freaking boomernomics
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> could we get a little general decency up in this bitch???
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> #god
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, Nick, for addressing this matter of property rights
>>>>>>>>>>> and home ownership.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you've not thought this through.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You own your self, ownership of your own mind and body.
>>>>>>>>>>> Private property is morally grounded in the right to own one's
>>>>>>>>>>> own body, which extends to the fruits of one's labor.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> u are not ur property
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, Nick, in reality you are owned - homeless.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's for your own protection - from coercion and allow you to
>>>>>>>>>>> make independent decisions, providing the security needed to
>>>>>>>>>>> live, work, and pursue your own happiness.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> yeah except most of the world is heavily limited by the rights
>>>>>>>>>> of others, and the situation is getting worse by the year
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> People have been thinking about this stuff for centuries, and
>>>>>>>>> have come up with some neat ideas.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> those people didn't live in a massive global civilization where
>>>>>>>> the overwhelming majority of productive land has been claimed,
>>>>>>>> with most people are trapped in nation-states they can do little
>>>>>>>> to escape, and the population is *still* rising...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will
>>>>>>>>> within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I
>>>>>>>>> do not add
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> words are fucking cheap
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the reality is the vast majority of people are totally obstructed
>>>>>>>> in action by all the property rights that has been drawn up,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and u are deciding to stick ur head up ur asshole instead of
>>>>>>>> addressing the fundamental contradiction of just the first
>>>>>>>> sentence...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > take it to the grave bro, we all know u will
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > #god
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You clearly don't understand what's being said there regarding the
>>>>>>> limits on rightful action.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and you clearly don't understand what's being said on the vast
>>>>>> existential obstruction generated thru supposed "rightful action"
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't even understand that sentence, so you might be right!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > the reality is the vast majority of people are totally
>>>> obstructed in
>>>> > action by all the property rights that has been drawn up,
>>>>
>>>
>>> They are obstructed in their action to take other people's property by
>>> ethical standards which are agreed upon by an actual real world
>>> consensus (as opposed to wishes and hopes).
>>
>> there is no actually established consensus, because we don't put in the
>> effort to do any sort of explicit consensus making. there is just a norm
>> enforced by govt run by those who have the majority of the wealth
>>
>> ur too scared to give the world's people an actual voice cause ofc
>> they'd vote to redistribute the land moron, as most of them have jack shit
>>
>>>
>>> Don't take other peoples stuff and it won't get ugly.
>>>
>>
>> when people hording stuff, especially life sustaining resources,
>> interferes with a basic right to pursuit of happiness ...
>>
>> then yes it will and should get ugly because ur a narcissistic sociopath
>> u doesn't give a crap about anyone other than ur own greed
>>
>> u can take ur ignorance to grave wilson
>>
>
>Forced redistribution is not ethical.
As might say, as ethical as forced accumulation.
--
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<>> to <<>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
