From: punditster@gmail.com
On 2/7/2026 8:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 10:53:58 -0500, Wilson
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/6/2026 6:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>> On 2/6/26 1:41 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 2/6/2026 2:33 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>> On 2/6/26 10:33 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/6/2026 1:25 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/6/26 9:36 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/4/2026 3:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/26 10:15 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/2026 1:07 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/3/26 10:05 AM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/2/2026 11:14 AM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> u built a house on a parcel of land and now everyone in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> entire world
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just supposed to respect that because???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you used resources that no one produced (land, raw material) and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is therefore yours by right of violence indefinitely into the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> future???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what is reality just a giant game of finders keepers???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> u have no problem with landlords, why in the fuck do u have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with landlords submissive to democratic input???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's always such a weird contradiction libertarians display:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> no problem
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with "private" landlords, but all the problems with "public"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> landlords...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> i'm arguing with submature children tbh, freaking boomernomics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> could we get a little general decency up in this bitch???
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #god
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, Nick, for addressing this matter of property rights
>>>>>>>>>>>> and home ownership.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you've not thought this through.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You own your self, ownership of your own mind and body.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Private property is morally grounded in the right to own one's
>>>>>>>>>>>> own body, which extends to the fruits of one's labor.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> u are not ur property
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, Nick, in reality you are owned - homeless.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's for your own protection - from coercion and allow you to
>>>>>>>>>>>> make independent decisions, providing the security needed to
>>>>>>>>>>>> live, work, and pursue your own happiness.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> yeah except most of the world is heavily limited by the rights
>>>>>>>>>>> of others, and the situation is getting worse by the year
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> People have been thinking about this stuff for centuries, and
>>>>>>>>>> have come up with some neat ideas.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> those people didn't live in a massive global civilization where
>>>>>>>>> the overwhelming majority of productive land has been claimed,
>>>>>>>>> with most people are trapped in nation-states they can do little
>>>>>>>>> to escape, and the population is *still* rising...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will
>>>>>>>>>> within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I
>>>>>>>>>> do not add
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> words are fucking cheap
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the reality is the vast majority of people are totally obstructed
>>>>>>>>> in action by all the property rights that has been drawn up,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and u are deciding to stick ur head up ur asshole instead of
>>>>>>>>> addressing the fundamental contradiction of just the first
>>>>>>>>> sentence...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > take it to the grave bro, we all know u will
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > #god
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You clearly don't understand what's being said there regarding the
>>>>>>>> limits on rightful action.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and you clearly don't understand what's being said on the vast
>>>>>>> existential obstruction generated thru supposed "rightful action"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't even understand that sentence, so you might be right!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > the reality is the vast majority of people are totally
>>>>> obstructed in
>>>>> > action by all the property rights that has been drawn up,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They are obstructed in their action to take other people's property by
>>>> ethical standards which are agreed upon by an actual real world
>>>> consensus (as opposed to wishes and hopes).
>>>
>>> there is no actually established consensus, because we don't put in the
>>> effort to do any sort of explicit consensus making. there is just a norm
>>> enforced by govt run by those who have the majority of the wealth
>>>
>>> ur too scared to give the world's people an actual voice cause ofc
>>> they'd vote to redistribute the land moron, as most of them have jack shit
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Don't take other peoples stuff and it won't get ugly.
>>>>
>>>
>>> when people hording stuff, especially life sustaining resources,
>>> interferes with a basic right to pursuit of happiness ...
>>>
>>> then yes it will and should get ugly because ur a narcissistic sociopath
>>> u doesn't give a crap about anyone other than ur own greed
>>>
>>> u can take ur ignorance to grave wilson
>>>
>>
>> Forced redistribution is not ethical.
>
> As might say, as ethical as forced accumulation.
>
If someone said that around here, they would probably get head butted!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
