From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Sun, 8 Feb 2026 14:48:27 -0500, Wilson    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 2/8/2026 2:01 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >> On 2/8/2026 9:46 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Sun, 8 Feb 2026 12:04:14 -0500, Wilson    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>> On 2/7/2026 3:19 PM, Julian wrote:   
   >>>>> On 07/02/2026 15:53, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2/6/2026 6:02 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 2/6/26 1:41 PM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/6/2026 2:33 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> the reality is the vast majority of people are totally   
   >>>>>>>>>> obstructed in   
   >>>>>>>>>> action by all the property rights that has been drawn up,   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> They are obstructed in their action to take other people's property   
   >>>>>>>> by ethical standards which are agreed upon by an actual real world   
   >>>>>>>> consensus (as opposed to wishes and hopes).   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> there is no actually established consensus, because we don't put in   
   >>>>>>> the effort to do any sort of explicit consensus making. there is just   
   >>>>>>> a norm enforced by govt run by those who have the majority of the   
   >>>>>>> wealth   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ur too scared to give the world's people an actual voice cause ofc   
   >>>>>>> they'd vote to redistribute the land moron, as most of them have jack   
   >>>>>>> shit   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Don't take other peoples stuff and it won't get ugly.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> when people hording stuff, especially life sustaining resources,   
   >>>>>>> interferes with a basic right to pursuit of happiness ...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> then yes it will and should get ugly because ur a narcissistic   
   >>>>>>> sociopath u doesn't give a crap about anyone other than ur own greed   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> u can take ur ignorance to grave wilson   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Forced redistribution is not ethical.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Worse, it isn't efficient or effective.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Actions that go against natural law are always like that.   
   >>>   
   >>> That go against your self interest, or so you would like us to   
   >>> believe.   
   >>   
   >> Speak for your self.   
   >>   
   >> Natural law asserts that certain moral principles and rights are   
   >> inherent in human nature. They are universal, and can be discovered   
   >> through reason instead of being created by society.   
   >   
   >The neat thing about natural law is it exists outside of ourselves and   
   >our beliefs. No one can own or control it. But it can be discovered and   
   >recognized, because it is truth.   
      
   At least it seems that way when it seems to agree with what you prefer   
   to believe.   
      
   And social structures appear to be a priori, but are not.  They are   
   simply what we receive during childhood, which could be nearly   
   anything depending on time and place.   
   --   
   Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain   
   Don't get political with me young man   
   or I'll tie you to a railroad track and   
   <<>> to <<>>   
   Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?   
   dares: Ned   
   does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)