From: user7160@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   On 2/8/26 11:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   > On 2/8/2026 2:01 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >> On 2/8/2026 9:46 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Sun, 8 Feb 2026 12:04:14 -0500, Wilson    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>> On 2/7/2026 3:19 PM, Julian wrote:   
   >>>>> On 07/02/2026 15:53, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 2/6/2026 6:02 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 2/6/26 1:41 PM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 2/6/2026 2:33 PM, dart200 wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> the reality is the vast majority of people are totally   
   >>>>>>>>>> obstructed in   
   >>>>>>>>>> action by all the property rights that has been drawn up,   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> They are obstructed in their action to take other people's property   
   >>>>>>>> by ethical standards which are agreed upon by an actual real world   
   >>>>>>>> consensus (as opposed to wishes and hopes).   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> there is no actually established consensus, because we don't put in   
   >>>>>>> the effort to do any sort of explicit consensus making. there is   
   >>>>>>> just   
   >>>>>>> a norm enforced by govt run by those who have the majority of the   
   >>>>>>> wealth   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ur too scared to give the world's people an actual voice cause ofc   
   >>>>>>> they'd vote to redistribute the land moron, as most of them have   
   >>>>>>> jack   
   >>>>>>> shit   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Don't take other peoples stuff and it won't get ugly.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> when people hording stuff, especially life sustaining resources,   
   >>>>>>> interferes with a basic right to pursuit of happiness ...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> then yes it will and should get ugly because ur a narcissistic   
   >>>>>>> sociopath u doesn't give a crap about anyone other than ur own greed   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> u can take ur ignorance to grave wilson   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Forced redistribution is not ethical.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Worse, it isn't efficient or effective.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Actions that go against natural law are always like that.   
   >>>   
   >>> That go against your self interest, or so you would like us to   
   >>> believe.   
   >>   
   >> Speak for your self.   
   >>   
   >> Natural law asserts that certain moral principles and rights are   
   >> inherent in human nature. They are universal, and can be discovered   
   >> through reason instead of being created by society.   
   >   
   > The neat thing about natural law is it exists outside of ourselves and   
   > our beliefs. No one can own or control it. But it can be discovered and   
   > recognized, because it is truth.   
   >   
      
   natural law, divine right ... what's the difference???   
      
   u wouldn't know rationalism from ur own asshole wilson   
      
   --   
   hi, i'm nick! let's end war 🙃   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)