From: Wilson@nowhere.invalid
On 2/9/2026 8:55 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 2/9/26 11:40 AM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 2/8/2026 3:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 2/8/2026 3:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>> On 2/8/26 11:48 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 2/8/2026 2:01 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/8/2026 9:46 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 Feb 2026 12:04:14 -0500, Wilson
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/7/2026 3:19 PM, Julian wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2026 15:53, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2026 6:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/26 1:41 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2026 2:33 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the reality is the vast majority of people are totally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obstructed in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> action by all the property rights that has been drawn up,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> They are obstructed in their action to take other people's
>>>>>>>>>>>> property
>>>>>>>>>>>> by ethical standards which are agreed upon by an actual real
>>>>>>>>>>>> world
>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus (as opposed to wishes and hopes).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> there is no actually established consensus, because we don't
>>>>>>>>>>> put in
>>>>>>>>>>> the effort to do any sort of explicit consensus making. there
>>>>>>>>>>> is just
>>>>>>>>>>> a norm enforced by govt run by those who have the majority of
>>>>>>>>>>> the wealth
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ur too scared to give the world's people an actual voice
>>>>>>>>>>> cause ofc
>>>>>>>>>>> they'd vote to redistribute the land moron, as most of them
>>>>>>>>>>> have jack
>>>>>>>>>>> shit
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't take other peoples stuff and it won't get ugly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> when people hording stuff, especially life sustaining resources,
>>>>>>>>>>> interferes with a basic right to pursuit of happiness ...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> then yes it will and should get ugly because ur a narcissistic
>>>>>>>>>>> sociopath u doesn't give a crap about anyone other than ur
>>>>>>>>>>> own greed
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> u can take ur ignorance to grave wilson
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Forced redistribution is not ethical.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Worse, it isn't efficient or effective.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actions that go against natural law are always like that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That go against your self interest, or so you would like us to
>>>>>>> believe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Speak for your self.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Natural law asserts that certain moral principles and rights are
>>>>>> inherent in human nature. They are universal, and can be
>>>>>> discovered through reason instead of being created by society.
>>>>>
>>>>> The neat thing about natural law is it exists outside of ourselves
>>>>> and our beliefs. No one can own or control it. But it can be
>>>>> discovered and recognized, because it is truth.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> natural law, divine right ... what's the difference???
>>>>
>>>> u wouldn't know rationalism from ur own asshole wilson
>>>
>>> Okay Nick.
>>
>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HAg_BEEWsAAMNuh?format=jpg
>>
>> Property rights are human rights.
>>
>
> 🙄🙄🙄 anarcho-capitalism is a literal oxymoron: landlords (those with
a
> right to enforce their will in respect to some lands) *are* the
> authority over their lands, even moreso in ancapistan...
Anarcho-capitalism simply acknowledges the natural rights of the
individual, and respects the product of his labor.
> as an non-denominational anarchist (also known as an anarchist): i'm
> skeptical of govt action in general, but understand we're far from ready
> for anarchy proper, so govt is here to stay for a few generations at
> least. and to get that point we will need to increasing pare back using
> govt to solve literally everything we think is wrong like statist do,
> and develop communally/voluntarily supported systems instead
>
With that I agree 100%.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
