From: fedora@fea.st
On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 09:43:45 -0800, Dude wrote:
>On 2/9/2026 2:46 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 13:27:43 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/8/2026 12:41 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 8 Feb 2026 11:44:14 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/8/2026 9:48 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 8 Feb 2026 09:44:46 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/7/2026 7:16 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 09:36:40 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/2026 7:55 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 7 Feb 2026 09:33:18 -0500, Wilson
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2026 9:11 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2026 1:46 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "An ordinance creating a reparations fund for Black residents in
San
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Francisco has finally been signed into law, but the program
lacks an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> identified source of funding. Mayor Daniel Lurie has stated that
no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> city funds will be used, (even though he signed the law!)
emphasizing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the fund's reliance on private donations...none of which have
been
>>>>>>>>>>>>> received.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You just can't make this stuff up!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> San Francisco has formally established a reparations fund for
Black
>>>>>>>>>>>> residents. Except the City has a $1 billion budget deficit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The ordinance was passed, but no immediate cash payouts for
initiatives
>>>>>>>>>>>> like $5 million per person!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wait! What?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's fine! There's no problem! Just create a board of directors
and pay
>>>>>>>>>>> them a stipend to have a few meetings. There's no need to actually
do
>>>>>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Progressive government programs are dysfunctional ideas living in a
>>>>>>>>>>> fantasy land of virtue so they can say, "We did the thing!"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As it this were a new idea or not equally practiced by r's.
>>>>>>>>>> So, I had to read that twice: 5 million dollars each for
reparations as
>>>>>>>>> payback by liberal Democrats for supporting the slave trade?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There's no way anyone could make this up!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your attitude towards the whole thing speaks for itself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's only fair that the Democrats pay reparations for the slave trade
>>>>>>> and to the disenfranchised Mexicans too. That was a terrible thing to
do
>>>>>>> to people for profit. So, I figure Native Americans in Canada should
get
>>>>>>> their welfare, at least, to triple from $640 month up to at least a
>>>>>>> living wage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems to me the quote says, nobody is being paid for anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>> It means regardless of wealth or status, every person ultimately pledges
>>>>> their loyalty and service to a higher power. It's a spiritual choice,
>>>>> serve the Lord or serve another.
>>>>
>>>> Or so the bible would have us believe.
>>>>
>>> If you are religious, you would probably elect to serve the Lord. If you
>>> were an atheist, you would probably serve somebody else, like "Daddy"
>>> Warbucks or the King. The point is, you've got to serve somebody.
>>
>> So the bible says.
>>
>> the things that yer lible
>> to read in the bible
>> they anin't nessussarily so.
>>
>> So says Porgy.
>>
>> As for me, I think there are enough excuses for mindlessness around
>> without that one.
>>
>Everyone is different.
>
>Apparently, Quebec is full of Roman Catholics, serving the Lord, while
>in the US Midwest you'll find Protestants.
>
>If you're not serving the Lord you are probably serving someone else,
>like the King, or your boss at work.
>
>You've got to serve somebody and pay your taxes.
>
>Or, you could retire and just be mindless and serve yourself a cup of
>Joe. In the end, you've got to pay somebody. YMMV.
You have got to participate in paying everybody for everything always.
That is under the current dispensation. It is not a priori. It also
does not mean you are serving. You are simply being paid and paying.
Circulating money through the system.
As some wise guy historian said of what historians will say about us
now, "they bought and they sold". Suggesting that is all that we do.
I'd say that mostly sums up the total emptiness of it all.
Except that does not mean that as individuals, we cannot refuse to buy
into the necessity of it all, or serve the system. It is possible to
say, I object. This is not right. Gimme a break.
> > >>
>>>> However, your quote is about no such thing. It is about a dummy
>>>> agency created to look good to constituencies while costing nothing,
>>>> which is certainly not a recent idea of either r's or d's.
>>>>
>>>>> True autonomy is an illusion, according to Dylan. You've got to serve
>>>>> somebody or pay the Devil. (1979).
>>>>
>>>> Either that or you can choose to not believe such stuff.
>>>>
>>> You can choose to believe anything. It's your mind.
--
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<>> to <<>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
