From: fedora@fea.st
On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:18:20 -0500, Wilson
wrote:
>On 2/10/2026 12:32 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 12:03:21 -0500, Wilson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/9/2026 6:03 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:16:41 -0500, Wilson
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/9/2026 2:59 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 14:40:19 -0500, Wilson
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/8/2026 3:53 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/8/2026 3:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/26 11:48 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/2026 2:01 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/2026 9:46 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 Feb 2026 12:04:14 -0500, Wilson
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/7/2026 3:19 PM, Julian wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2026 15:53, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2026 6:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/26 1:41 PM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/6/2026 2:33 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the reality is the vast majority of people are totally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obstructed in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> action by all the property rights that has been drawn up,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are obstructed in their action to take other people's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> property
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by ethical standards which are agreed upon by an actual real
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> world
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus (as opposed to wishes and hopes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is no actually established consensus, because we don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the effort to do any sort of explicit consensus making. there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a norm enforced by govt run by those who have the majority of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wealth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ur too scared to give the world's people an actual voice
cause ofc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they'd vote to redistribute the land moron, as most of them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have jack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't take other peoples stuff and it won't get ugly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when people hording stuff, especially life sustaining
resources,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interferes with a basic right to pursuit of happiness ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then yes it will and should get ugly because ur a narcissistic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sociopath u doesn't give a crap about anyone other than ur own
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> greed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> u can take ur ignorance to grave wilson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Forced redistribution is not ethical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Worse, it isn't efficient or effective.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actions that go against natural law are always like that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That go against your self interest, or so you would like us to
>>>>>>>>>>>> believe.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Speak for your self.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Natural law asserts that certain moral principles and rights are
>>>>>>>>>>> inherent in human nature. They are universal, and can be discovered
>>>>>>>>>>> through reason instead of being created by society.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The neat thing about natural law is it exists outside of ourselves
>>>>>>>>>> and our beliefs. No one can own or control it. But it can be
>>>>>>>>>> discovered and recognized, because it is truth.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> natural law, divine right ... what's the difference???
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> u wouldn't know rationalism from ur own asshole wilson
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Okay Nick.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HAg_BEEWsAAMNuh?format=jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You mean you wish they were.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cochise would like a word. Greenlanders too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cochise was conquered. Kinda sad but that's how it happened. I'd rather
>>>>> people stopped doing that sort of thing but I don't think I can change
>>>>> the past.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greenlanders, are free to not own property if they wish. If that's their
>>>>> voluntary choice and they're not stealing anyone's property and that's
>>>>> the system they want, it's fine with me.
>>>>
>>>> "The neat thing about natural law is it exists outside of ourselves
>>>> and our beliefs. No one can own or control it. But it can be
>>>> discovered and recognized, because it is truth."
>>>>
>>>> So in greenland, natural law has become optional.
>>>> And Cochise says, being conquered has nothing to do with the existence
>>>> or not of your proposed natural law.
>>>
>>> If I imposed property ownership onto Greenlanders against their will,
>>> that would be in opposition to natural law. If I allow them to live
>>> their lives without property rights as they wish, that's in harmony with
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Natural law is never optional, but like all truths we can ignore it for
>>> a time.
>>
>> Sorry cochise and greenland, wilson has codified his opinion into a
>> natural law, so of course, cochise you lost the battle, and greenland
>> the universe will put up with you for now.
>
>Yeah that's the thing you just can't grasp. Natural law isn't defined by
>opinion, it exists. And all we can do is try to discover and understand it.
Oh, I understand what you want to say, but I anin't buying it. Your
opinion is not about to be a natural law. Not at all, nope, not going
to happen ever.
--
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<>> to <<>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
