From: punditster@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   > On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go down in   
   >> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one man’s   
   >> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire impact those   
   >> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and girls.   
   >>   
   >> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a   
   >> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the conscience of   
   >> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s   
   >> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word   
   >> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their hollow souls.   
   >> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail went up:   
   >> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>   
   >> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal Ahmad   
   >> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying out   
   >> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week confirmed   
   >> what working-class women up and down the country have been saying for   
   >> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a grave threat   
   >> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK where these   
   >> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >   
   When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along with   
   the scenery!   
    >   
   > Count the dog whistles:   
   > tax payer expense   
   > rapists   
   > threat to women and girls   
   > small boat criminal   
   > extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   > working class women   
   > porous borders   
   > grave threat   
   > men from afar   
   >   
   > This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.  The truth is, I   
   > suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   > immigration until the politics of it is removed from all sides.  You   
   > too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >   
   > What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there in the   
   > past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by immigrants?   
   > Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?  No, stop that,   
   > don't look at that.   
   >   
   Sounds like a coverup.   
      
   Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the widespread   
   cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that mostly   
   occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of governmental and   
   institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or cover   
   up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
      
   See: Grooming gangs scandal   
      
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grooming_gangs_scandal   
    >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)