From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
      
   >On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go down in   
   >>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one man’s   
   >>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire impact those   
   >>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and girls.   
   >>>   
   >>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a   
   >>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the conscience of   
   >>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s   
   >>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word   
   >>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their hollow souls.   
   >>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail went up:   
   >>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>   
   >>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal Ahmad   
   >>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying out   
   >>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week confirmed   
   >>> what working-class women up and down the country have been saying for   
   >>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a grave threat   
   >>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK where these   
   >>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>   
   >When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along with   
   >the scenery!   
   > >   
   >> Count the dog whistles:   
   >> tax payer expense   
   >> rapists   
   >> threat to women and girls   
   >> small boat criminal   
   >> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >> working class women   
   >> porous borders   
   >> grave threat   
   >> men from afar   
   >>   
   >> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.  The truth is, I   
   >> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   >> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all sides.  You   
   >> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>   
   >> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there in the   
   >> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by immigrants?   
   >> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?  No, stop that,   
   >> don't look at that.   
   >>   
   >Sounds like a coverup.   
   >   
   >Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   >institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the widespread   
   >cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that mostly   
   >occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of governmental and   
   >institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or cover   
   >up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
   >   
   >See: Grooming gangs scandal   
      
   And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to rapes   
   by natives.   
      
   >   
   >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grooming_gangs_scandal   
   > >   
   --   
   Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain   
   Don't get political with me young man   
   or I'll tie you to a railroad track and   
   <<>> to <<>>   
   Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?   
   dares: Ned   
   does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)