From: Wilson@nowhere.invalid   
      
   On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   > On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go down in   
   >>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one man’s   
   >>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire impact those   
   >>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and girls.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a   
   >>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the conscience of   
   >>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word   
   >>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their hollow   
   souls.   
   >>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail went up:   
   >>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal Ahmad   
   >>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying out   
   >>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week   
   confirmed   
   >>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been saying for   
   >>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a grave threat   
   >>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK where these   
   >>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>   
   >> When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along with   
   >> the scenery!   
   >>>   
   >>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>> tax payer expense   
   >>> rapists   
   >>> threat to women and girls   
   >>> small boat criminal   
   >>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>> working class women   
   >>> porous borders   
   >>> grave threat   
   >>> men from afar   
   >>>   
   >>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.  The truth is, I   
   >>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   >>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all sides.  You   
   >>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>   
   >>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there in the   
   >>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by immigrants?   
   >>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?  No, stop that,   
   >>> don't look at that.   
   >>>   
   >> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>   
   >> Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   >> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the widespread   
   >> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that mostly   
   >> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of governmental and   
   >> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or cover   
   >> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
   >>   
   >> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >   
   > And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to rapes   
   > by natives.   
      
   Why don't you look it up yourself?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)