From: fedora@fea.st
On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 16:36:36 -0000 (UTC), Tara
wrote:
>On Feb 13, 2026 at 11:13:44?AM EST, "Noah Sombrero" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 07:46:32 -0800, dart200
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/13/26 6:14 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 21:50:15 -0800, dart200
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/12/26 9:05 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 08:31:09 -0800, dart200
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/10/26 7:49 PM, Tara wrote:
>>>>>>>> Tara wrote:
>>>>>>>>> dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/26 6:27 PM, Tara wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/26 11:40 AM, Tara wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?I?m not discouraged at all. I think we?re living a very
important time in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> world. It?s a big shift. It is probably what I would call the
beginning of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> end of the American empire. And it has to come, all the empires
change, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> now, you know, it?s accelerated, but we are in a very good
position, because
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have land, we have the best educated people in the world, you
know that,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and we have the tolerance that is a great value, we have the
sharing that does
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not exist in many other countries, we have less very, very rich
people per
>>>>>>>>>>>>> capita, but less very, very poor people too in Canada, and we
have the unity,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that we have to fight all the time about that...?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean Chretien
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feb 2, 2026
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Former and most loved Prime Minister of Canada
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ok boomer as if canadians don't depend on us for defense
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> they just don't pay taxes into that defense
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hey little millenial twitt. Ever heard of NATO. We fought with
you in
>>>>>>>>>>> Afghanistan and Korea because we are part of NATO yeah. And what
it stood
>>>>>>>>>>> for.
>>>>>>>>>>> As for not paying our share to NATO, as well as other countries,
we know
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ya'll spend under the 2% NATO target lol
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> us spends 3.5%, and 35% of the global defense spending. ur welcome ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> isreal ... spends 8.8%, highest of any country besides ukraine, (and
30%
>>>>>>> of which comes from the us) lol
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> honestly i could forgive them for 911. but probably only if they'd
>>>>>>> accept us statehood. 51st state. i'm not sure if this would actually
>>>>>>> increase their influence over us politics over what they have already,
>>>>>>> but at least it would make it a bit more transparent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> or rather ... first instead i think it's high time to give puerto rico
>>>>>>> statehood to demonstrate that we're honest about adding more blood into
>>>>>>> congress and the government tbh. joos can be 52nd ehhh???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is up to them. Repeatedly over the years, there have been
>>>>>> initiatives in pr to become a state. They have been turned down every
>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Exactly like greenlanders, puerto ricans get to decide.
>>>>>
>>>>> actually congress gets to decide in regards to puerto rico
>>>>
>>>> If they ask, congress can accept. As it is, you are right, statehood
>>>> for pr is a mess. The most recent referendum did not have an option
>>>> to remain a territory. The options were statehood, or independence or
>>>> a mix sorta. Of those three, you might expect statehood would win.
>>>> But the referendums are not binding. The govt of pr is not required
>>>> to seek statehood based on them. Congress lately has not been able to
>>>> decide what it wants to do. Bills have been introduced to make pr a
>>>> state, but go nowhere.
>>>>
>>>> Himbo has said he would not approve pr statehood because the mayor of
>>>> San Juan was not nice to him. Others too probably. You know what,
>>>> pr, why would you want to join this sinking ship anyway?
>>>
>>> clearly nothing that even hints at shaking up the status quo for the
>>> better is going to happen while boomers are still in power eh???
>>>
>>> fuck boomers dude, idk what else to tell ya
>>
>> Like women who think the world would be peaceful if only women could
>> be in power. They have had a few chances. No peace yet.
>>
>> Spooners would do better? My hunch is that over the ages humans
>> mostly remain humans.
>
>
>Yeah, I know what you want to believe but have a look at facts.
>
>“Ninety-five percent of mass shootings are committed by men,” says Fox, a
>research professor of criminology, law and public policy at Northeastern. “The
>overall majority of violent crimes — particularly homicide and gun homicide —
>are committed by men.”
>
>https://news.northeastern.edu/2024/12/17/mass-shootings-by-wome
-wisconsin-school/
>
>And:
>
>Women commit a small fraction of homicides and murders compared to men,
>accounting for roughly 10-13% of all homicide offenders. Female-perpetrated
>mass murder is even rarer, representing only about 5-6% of cases. Men are
>responsible for approximately 90% of all homicide cases worldwide, with
>significantly higher rates of violence.
This does not mean that as leaders, their dispensations have resulted
in more peace.
Golda Mier
Margaret Thatcher and the falkland islands - sure you can argue that
britain needed to keep those islands way down there by argentina, but
what would a more peaceful leader have done? Not that it wouldn't be
political suicide to give those islands away.
--
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<>> to <<>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
