Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.buddha.short.fat.guy    |    Uhhh not sure, something about Buddhism    |    155,846 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 155,137 of 155,846    |
|    Wilson to All    |
|    Re: on freaking boomernomics    |
|    13 Feb 26 13:06:41    |
      XPost: alt.messianic       From: Wilson@nowhere.invalid              On 2/13/2026 1:12 AM, dart200 wrote:       > On 2/12/26 8:30 AM, Wilson wrote:       >> On 2/11/2026 3:32 PM, dart200 wrote:       >>> On 2/11/26 9:46 AM, Wilson wrote:       >>>> On 2/10/2026 11:53 PM, dart200 wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>> just because we are generations from a fully voluntary society,       >>>>> does not mean we cannot, or need not, make progressive steps today       >>>>       >>>> Anarchism is about a stateless system without a *coercive* hierarchy       >>>> or authority. You absolutely can have binding agreements under such       >>>> a system if a mechanism is freely agreed upon to enforce them.       >>>       >>> if u change ur will in regards to their enforcement...       >>>       >>> then enforcing them takes acts of authority. prior agreement does not       >>> justify authority in anarchism because anarchism is *without authority*       >>>       >>> you find coercively holding people to their prior agreement as       >>> natural because ur just a statist bro       >>>       >>> just pick a different word, anarcho-capitalism is a literally oxymoron       >>>       >>>>       >>>> We have voluntary non-coercive authorities today, like the church for       >>>       >>> even the church threatens excommunication, so physically banning from       >>> participation if the crime is heavy enough       >>>       >>> anarchism can have no such mechanism because it takes authority to       >>> enforce it       >>>       >>>> one example. There's no reason why that shouldn't continue and even       >>>> expand into structures that include agreed-to arbitration to settle       >>>> conflicts when they arise.       >>>>       >>>> There are plenty of potential enforcement mechanisms for breaking an       >>>> agreement that would not require any sort of state structures or the       >>>> physical coercion, that would operate on a strictly voluntary basis.       >>>>       >>>> For one simple example, if the twenty-million people who are a part       >>>> of my voluntary trade group find out that you didn't live up to our       >>>> agreement, you'd find it very difficult to do business with any of       >>>> them and likely any of the other groups who are in agreement with us.       >>>       >>> why do u need to do business with others if u can just take what you       >>> need??? lol       >>>       >>> again, ur just such a statist u can't even imagine a world without       >>> authority ensuring order       >>>       >>>>       >>>> The idea is a voluntary society that's based on the non-aggression       >>>> principle, free markets, and self-ownership.       >>>>       >>>> Such a system would not result in people being deprived of basic       >>>> necessities to live, because human beings are compassionate and do       >>>> in fact care about other human beings. You can see this happening       >>>> today all around you.       >>>       >>> at a superficial level if even       >>>       >>>>       >>>> Even in nations that oppose other nations, people will voluntarily       >>>> donate and help those other people when it's not prohibited by law.       >>>> Sometimes even when it is.       >>       >>       >> A society without leaders is mob rule.       >       > anarchy can have leaders       >       > they just can't lead thru coercion, whether under "voluntary" contract       > or otherwise       >       >>       >> Just come out and say it Nick, you're an anarcho-communist.       >>       >       > no, i'm just an anarchist. i have a lot in common with communists, and       > empathize with them to a large degree...       >       > but i see the progression to the goal in a totally different light and       > am incredibly skeptical of any dictatorship of the proletariat nonsense,       > especially given the shitshow that was 20th century socialism       >       > u on the hand are just a libertarian capitalist              Agreed. Free markets and free people.              >       > anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron. doesn't exist, and will never exist              Come on man, it's got an entry on wikipedia.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca