From: fedora@fea.st
On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:48:50 -0500, Wilson
wrote:
>On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go down in
>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one man’s
>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire impact those
>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and girls.
>>>>>
>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a
>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the conscience of
>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s
>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word
>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their hollow souls.
>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail went up:
>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’
>>>>>
>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal Ahmad
>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying out
>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week confirmed
>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been saying for
>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a grave threat
>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK where these
>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.
>>>>
>>> When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along with
>>> the scenery!
>>>>
>>>> Count the dog whistles:
>>>> tax payer expense
>>>> rapists
>>>> threat to women and girls
>>>> small boat criminal
>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses
>>>> working class women
>>>> porous borders
>>>> grave threat
>>>> men from afar
>>>>
>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant. The truth is, I
>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about
>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all sides. You
>>>> too us. What do we know? That will not happen.
>>>>
>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there in the
>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants. 1 by immigrants?
>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives? No, stop that,
>>>> don't look at that.
>>>>
>>> Sounds like a coverup.
>>>
>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British
>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the widespread
>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that mostly
>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of governmental and
>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or cover
>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.
>>>
>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal
>>
>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to rapes
>> by natives.
>
>Why don't you look it up yourself?
Because I am not the one claiming that one rape by an immigrant
deserves all that incrimination of all immigrants. If you want to
make that claim, defend it.
--
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<>> to <<>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
