From: punditster@gmail.com   
      
   On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   > On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go down in   
   >>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one man’s   
   >>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire impact   
   >>>>> those   
   >>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and girls.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a   
   >>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the   
   >>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word   
   >>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their hollow   
   >>>>> souls.   
   >>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail went   
   >>>>> up:   
   >>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal Ahmad   
   >>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying out   
   >>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week   
   >>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been saying for   
   >>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a grave   
   >>>>> threat   
   >>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK where   
   >>>>> these   
   >>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>>   
   >>> When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along with   
   >>> the scenery!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>> rapists   
   >>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>> working class women   
   >>>> porous borders   
   >>>> grave threat   
   >>>> men from afar   
   >>>>   
   >>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.  The truth is, I   
   >>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   >>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all sides.  You   
   >>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there in the   
   >>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by immigrants?   
   >>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?  No, stop that,   
   >>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>   
   >>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>   
   >>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   >>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the widespread   
   >>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that mostly   
   >>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of governmental and   
   >>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or cover   
   >>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
   >>>   
   >>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>   
   >> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to rapes   
   >> by natives.   
   >   
   > Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >   
   That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper in Great   
   Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused by   
   immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just because of   
   the coverup.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)