From: Wilson@nowhere.invalid
On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:
> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:
>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go down in
>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one man’s
>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire impact
>>>>>> those
>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and girls.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a
>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the
>>>>>> conscience of
>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s
>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word
>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their hollow
>>>>>> souls.
>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail
>>>>>> went up:
>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal Ahmad
>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying out
>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week
>>>>>> confirmed
>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been saying for
>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a grave
>>>>>> threat
>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK where
>>>>>> these
>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.
>>>>>
>>>> When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along with
>>>> the scenery!
>>>>>
>>>>> Count the dog whistles:
>>>>> tax payer expense
>>>>> rapists
>>>>> threat to women and girls
>>>>> small boat criminal
>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses
>>>>> working class women
>>>>> porous borders
>>>>> grave threat
>>>>> men from afar
>>>>>
>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant. The truth is, I
>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about
>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all sides. You
>>>>> too us. What do we know? That will not happen.
>>>>>
>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there in the
>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants. 1 by immigrants?
>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives? No, stop that,
>>>>> don't look at that.
>>>>>
>>>> Sounds like a coverup.
>>>>
>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British
>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the widespread
>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that mostly
>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of governmental
>>>> and
>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or
>>>> cover
>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.
>>>>
>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal
>>>
>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to rapes
>>> by natives.
>>
>> Why don't you look it up yourself?
>>
> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper in Great
> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused by
> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just because of
> the coverup.
That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't say it.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
