From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:26:28 -0500, Wilson    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 2/13/2026 1:05 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:48:50 -0500, Wilson    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go down in   
   >>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one man’s   
   >>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire impact those   
   >>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and girls.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a   
   >>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the conscience of   
   >>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word   
   >>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their hollow   
   souls.   
   >>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail went up:   
   >>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal Ahmad   
   >>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying out   
   >>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week   
   confirmed   
   >>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been saying for   
   >>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a grave threat   
   >>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK where   
   these   
   >>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along with   
   >>>>> the scenery!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.  The truth is, I   
   >>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   >>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all sides.  You   
   >>>>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there in the   
   >>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by immigrants?   
   >>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?  No, stop that,   
   >>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   >>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the widespread   
   >>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that mostly   
   >>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of governmental and   
   >>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or cover   
   >>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to rapes   
   >>>> by natives.   
   >>>   
   >>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>   
   >> Because I am not the one claiming that one rape by an immigrant   
   >> deserves all that incrimination of all immigrants.  If you want to   
   >> make that claim, defend it.   
   >   
   >You're implying that the rate of rapes by migrants are not higher,   
      
   I make no such claim, but ask for evidence of yours.   
      
   >despite the evidence provided.   
      
   Provided:   
      
   > Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   > institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the widespread   
   > cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that mostly   
   > occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of governmental and   
   > institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or cover   
   > up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
      
   This mentions group based child sexual abuse and exploitation from   
   gangs.   
      
   It says nothing about immigrants or rapes generally including of   
   adults.   
      
   Evidence of your claim is not provided.   
      
   >Put up or shut up.   
   --   
   Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain   
   Don't get political with me young man   
   or I'll tie you to a railroad track and   
   <<>> to <<>>   
   Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?   
   dares: Ned   
   does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)