From: fedora@fea.st   
      
   On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson    
   wrote:   
      
   >On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:   
   >> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:   
   >>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go down in   
   >>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one man’s   
   >>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire impact   
   >>>>>>> those   
   >>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and girls.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a   
   >>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the   
   >>>>>>> conscience of   
   >>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s   
   >>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word   
   >>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their hollow   
   >>>>>>> souls.   
   >>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail   
   >>>>>>> went up:   
   >>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal Ahmad   
   >>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying out   
   >>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week   
   >>>>>>> confirmed   
   >>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been saying for   
   >>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a grave   
   >>>>>>> threat   
   >>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK where   
   >>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along with   
   >>>>> the scenery!   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Count the dog whistles:   
   >>>>>> tax payer expense   
   >>>>>> rapists   
   >>>>>> threat to women and girls   
   >>>>>> small boat criminal   
   >>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses   
   >>>>>> working class women   
   >>>>>> porous borders   
   >>>>>> grave threat   
   >>>>>> men from afar   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant.  The truth is, I   
   >>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about   
   >>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all sides.  You   
   >>>>>> too us.  What do we know?  That will not happen.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there in the   
   >>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants.  1 by immigrants?   
   >>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives?  No, stop that,   
   >>>>>> don't look at that.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> Sounds like a coverup.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British   
   >>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the widespread   
   >>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that mostly   
   >>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of governmental   
   >>>>> and   
   >>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or   
   >>>>> cover   
   >>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to rapes   
   >>>> by natives.   
   >>>   
   >>> Why don't you look it up yourself?   
   >>>   
   >> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper in Great   
   >> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused by   
   >> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just because of   
   >> the coverup.   
   >   
   >That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't say it.   
      
   It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence.  It is true, I   
   would not accept information from britain's tabloids.   
      
   You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed me your   
   propaganda and sensationalism.   
   --   
   Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain   
   Don't get political with me young man   
   or I'll tie you to a railroad track and   
   <<>> to <<>>   
   Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?   
   dares: Ned   
   does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)