From: fedora@fea.st
On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude wrote:
>On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go down in
>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one man’s
>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire impact
>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and girls.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a
>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the
>>>>>>>>> conscience of
>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s
>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word
>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their hollow
>>>>>>>>> souls.
>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail
>>>>>>>>> went up:
>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal Ahmad
>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying out
>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week
>>>>>>>>> confirmed
>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been saying for
>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a grave
>>>>>>>>> threat
>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK where
>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along with
>>>>>>> the scenery!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:
>>>>>>>> tax payer expense
>>>>>>>> rapists
>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls
>>>>>>>> small boat criminal
>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses
>>>>>>>> working class women
>>>>>>>> porous borders
>>>>>>>> grave threat
>>>>>>>> men from afar
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant. The truth is, I
>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about
>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all sides. You
>>>>>>>> too us. What do we know? That will not happen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there in the
>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants. 1 by immigrants?
>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives? No, stop that,
>>>>>>>> don't look at that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British
>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the widespread
>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that mostly
>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of governmental
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or
>>>>>>> cover
>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to rapes
>>>>>> by natives.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?
>>>>>
>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper in Great
>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused by
>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just because of
>>>> the coverup.
>>>
>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't say it.
>>
>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence. It is true, I
>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.
>>
>Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.
> >
>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed me your
>> propaganda and sensationalism.
> >
>Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.
>
>The crimes and the coverup were investigated by the BBC. Read up.
>
>Apparently, the police and the local administration turned a blind eye
>concerning reports of gang rapes in the neighborhood by Pakistani and
>other immigrants, numbering in the thousands. Why?
>
>DEI. They were afraid to be called racist, so they tried to cover it up.
>
>Now, the coverup has become more serious than the crimes themselves, if
>that was possible. You can't cover this stuff up forever, but two
>decades of coverup will include a lot of peiple high up in government.
>
>It's far from over after the Epstein files have been released.
That's great. I asked for actual numbers, comparing immigrant rapes
to all rapes.
--
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<>> to <<>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
