From: punditster@gmail.com
On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude wrote:
>
>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go down
in
>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one
man’s
>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire impact
>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and
girls.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a
>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the
>>>>>>>>>> conscience of
>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s
>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word
>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their
hollow
>>>>>>>>>> souls.
>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail
>>>>>>>>>> went up:
>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal
Ahmad
>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying out
>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week
>>>>>>>>>> confirmed
>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been saying
for
>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a grave
>>>>>>>>>> threat
>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK where
>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along with
>>>>>>>> the scenery!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:
>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense
>>>>>>>>> rapists
>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls
>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal
>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses
>>>>>>>>> working class women
>>>>>>>>> porous borders
>>>>>>>>> grave threat
>>>>>>>>> men from afar
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant. The truth is,
I
>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about
>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all sides. You
>>>>>>>>> too us. What do we know? That will not happen.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there in the
>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants. 1 by immigrants?
>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives? No, stop that,
>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British
>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the widespread
>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that mostly
>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of governmental
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or
>>>>>>>> cover
>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to rapes
>>>>>>> by natives.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?
>>>>>>
>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper in Great
>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused by
>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just because of
>>>>> the coverup.
>>>>
>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't say it.
>>>
>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence. It is true, I
>>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.
>>>
>> Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.
>>>
>>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed me your
>>> propaganda and sensationalism.
>>>
>> Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.
>>
>> The crimes and the coverup were investigated by the BBC. Read up.
>>
>> Apparently, the police and the local administration turned a blind eye
>> concerning reports of gang rapes in the neighborhood by Pakistani and
>> other immigrants, numbering in the thousands. Why?
>>
>> DEI. They were afraid to be called racist, so they tried to cover it up.
>>
>> Now, the coverup has become more serious than the crimes themselves, if
>> that was possible. You can't cover this stuff up forever, but two
>> decades of coverup will include a lot of peiple high up in government.
>>
>> It's far from over after the Epstein files have been released.
>
> That's great. I asked for actual numbers, comparing immigrant rapes
> to all rapes.
>
You are in no position to demand police files of underage victims, Senor!
You are part of the coverup by not doing your research. Believe the
women! They deserve justice and we demand it!
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
