From: fedora@fea.st
On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:59:21 -0800, Dude wrote:
>On 2/13/2026 11:27 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 11:23:05 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/13/2026 10:59 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:27:09 -0500, Wilson
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/13/2026 1:08 PM, Dude wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/13/2026 8:48 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 1:01 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:58:08 -0800, Dude wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2026 8:53 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:28:22 +0000, Julian
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Imagine getting angrier over a word than a rape. This will go down
in
>>>>>>>>>>> history as the week when there was more digital fury over one man’s
>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of mass immigration than there was over the dire impact
>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>> untrammelled flows of people are having on Britain’s women and
girls.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The conviction of an Afghan illegal migrant for the rape of a
>>>>>>>>>>> 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton barely seemed to trouble the
>>>>>>>>>>> conscience of
>>>>>>>>>>> the virtuous of our chattering classes. But Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s
>>>>>>>>>>> lamenting of our broken borders? Worse, his use of the word
>>>>>>>>>>> ‘colonisation’ in relation to migrants? That pricked their hollow
>>>>>>>>>>> souls.
>>>>>>>>>>> That got them tweeting. From Whitehall to White City, the wail
>>>>>>>>>>> went up:
>>>>>>>>>>> ‘Something must be done about this awful man.’
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The horror in Nuneaton involved 23-year-old small-boat criminal
Ahmad
>>>>>>>>>>> Mulakhil taking a girl into a cul-de-sac last July and carrying out
>>>>>>>>>>> ‘extremely horrific sexual offences’. His conviction this week
>>>>>>>>>>> confirmed
>>>>>>>>>>> what working-class women up and down the country have been saying
for
>>>>>>>>>>> more than a year now: that Britain’s porous borders pose a grave
>>>>>>>>>>> threat
>>>>>>>>>>> to women and girls, especially in the poorer parts of the UK where
>>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>> men from afar tend to be placed, at taxpayers’ expense.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When you own a half of the bloody third world it just comes along
with
>>>>>>>>> the scenery!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Count the dog whistles:
>>>>>>>>>> tax payer expense
>>>>>>>>>> rapists
>>>>>>>>>> threat to women and girls
>>>>>>>>>> small boat criminal
>>>>>>>>>> extremely horrific sexual offenses
>>>>>>>>>> working class women
>>>>>>>>>> porous borders
>>>>>>>>>> grave threat
>>>>>>>>>> men from afar
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This ladies and gentlemen is an anti-immigrant rant. The truth is,
I
>>>>>>>>>> suspect, that brits will be unable to rationally talk about
>>>>>>>>>> immigration until the politics of it is removed from all sides. You
>>>>>>>>>> too us. What do we know? That will not happen.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What we have not thought to count is how many rapes were there in
the
>>>>>>>>>> past year, and how many were done by immigrants. 1 by immigrants?
>>>>>>>>>> Could immigrants be better behaved than the natives? No, stop that,
>>>>>>>>>> don't look at that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a coverup.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Several government reviews have reported failures by British
>>>>>>>>> institutions in preventing, identifying and prosecuting the
widespread
>>>>>>>>> cases of group-based child sexual abuse and exploitation that mostly
>>>>>>>>> occurred between the 1990s and 2010s.[1] Allegations of governmental
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> institutional failures to respond to the problem or to downplay or
>>>>>>>>> cover
>>>>>>>>> up the issue have been described as a grooming gangs scandal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> See: Grooming gangs scandal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And while you are at it count rapes by immigrants, compared to rapes
>>>>>>>> by natives.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why don't you look it up yourself?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> That might take some effort - it's in almost every newspaper in Great
>>>>>> Britain for over a decade that thousands of girls were abused by
>>>>>> immigrant rape grooming gangs. It's a scandal, and not just because of
>>>>>> the coverup.
>>>>>
>>>>> That doesn't count because the NYTimes and the Guardian didn't say it.
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't count because you haven't provided evidence. It is true, I
>>>> would not accept information from britain's tabloids.
>>>>
>>> Not sure you'd call The Globe & Mail a tabloid, but maybe.
>>>>
>>>> You guys would do a lot better if you stopped trying to feed me your
>>>> propaganda and sensationalism.
>>>>
>>> Maybe you're just in denial, because shut up.
>>>
>>> The crimes and the coverup were investigated by the BBC. Read up.
>>>
>>> Apparently, the police and the local administration turned a blind eye
>>> concerning reports of gang rapes in the neighborhood by Pakistani and
>>> other immigrants, numbering in the thousands. Why?
>>>
>>> DEI. They were afraid to be called racist, so they tried to cover it up.
>>>
>>> Now, the coverup has become more serious than the crimes themselves, if
>>> that was possible. You can't cover this stuff up forever, but two
>>> decades of coverup will include a lot of peiple high up in government.
>>>
>>> It's far from over after the Epstein files have been released.
>>
>> That's great. I asked for actual numbers, comparing immigrant rapes
>> to all rapes.
> >
>You are in no position to demand police files of underage victims, Senor!
>
>You are part of the coverup by not doing your research. Believe the
>women! They deserve justice and we demand it!
I demand nothing, except that you support your claims.
--
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<>> to <<>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian shrinks in horror and warns others away
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
