From: tsm@fastmail.ca
On Feb 13, 2026 at 4:27:57 PM EST, "Tara" wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2026 at 3:01:57 PM EST, "dart200"
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/13/26 8:36 AM, Tara wrote:
>>> On Feb 13, 2026 at 11:13:44 AM EST, "Noah Sombrero"
wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 07:46:32 -0800, dart200
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/13/26 6:14 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 21:50:15 -0800, dart200
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/12/26 9:05 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 08:31:09 -0800, dart200
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/26 7:49 PM, Tara wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Tara wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/26 6:27 PM, Tara wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/26 11:40 AM, Tara wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Im not discouraged at all. I think were living a very
important time in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> world. Its a big shift. It is probably what I would call the
beginning of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end of the American empire. And it has to come, all the
empires change, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now, you know, its accelerated, but we are in a very good
position, because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have land, we have the best educated people in the world,
you know that,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and we have the tolerance that is a great value, we have the
sharing that does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not exist in many other countries, we have less very, very
rich people per
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capita, but less very, very poor people too in Canada, and we
have the unity,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that we have to fight all the time about that...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean Chretien
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feb 2, 2026
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Former and most loved Prime Minister of Canada
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok boomer as if canadians don't depend on us for defense
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they just don't pay taxes into that defense
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey little millenial twitt. Ever heard of NATO. We fought with
you in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Afghanistan and Korea because we are part of NATO yeah. And what
it stood
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for not paying our share to NATO, as well as other countries,
we know
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ya'll spend under the 2% NATO target lol
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> us spends 3.5%, and 35% of the global defense spending. ur welcome ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> isreal ... spends 8.8%, highest of any country besides ukraine, (and
30%
>>>>>>>>> of which comes from the us) lol
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> honestly i could forgive them for 911. but probably only if they'd
>>>>>>>>> accept us statehood. 51st state. i'm not sure if this would actually
>>>>>>>>> increase their influence over us politics over what they have
already,
>>>>>>>>> but at least it would make it a bit more transparent.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> or rather ... first instead i think it's high time to give puerto
rico
>>>>>>>>> statehood to demonstrate that we're honest about adding more blood
into
>>>>>>>>> congress and the government tbh. joos can be 52nd ehhh???
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is up to them. Repeatedly over the years, there have been
>>>>>>>> initiatives in pr to become a state. They have been turned down every
>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Exactly like greenlanders, puerto ricans get to decide.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> actually congress gets to decide in regards to puerto rico
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If they ask, congress can accept. As it is, you are right, statehood
>>>>>> for pr is a mess. The most recent referendum did not have an option
>>>>>> to remain a territory. The options were statehood, or independence or
>>>>>> a mix sorta. Of those three, you might expect statehood would win.
>>>>>> But the referendums are not binding. The govt of pr is not required
>>>>>> to seek statehood based on them. Congress lately has not been able to
>>>>>> decide what it wants to do. Bills have been introduced to make pr a
>>>>>> state, but go nowhere.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Himbo has said he would not approve pr statehood because the mayor of
>>>>>> San Juan was not nice to him. Others too probably. You know what,
>>>>>> pr, why would you want to join this sinking ship anyway?
>>>>>
>>>>> clearly nothing that even hints at shaking up the status quo for the
>>>>> better is going to happen while boomers are still in power eh???
>>>>>
>>>>> fuck boomers dude, idk what else to tell ya
>>>>
>>>> Like women who think the world would be peaceful if only women could
>>>> be in power. They have had a few chances. No peace yet.
>>>>
>>>> Spooners would do better? My hunch is that over the ages humans
>>>> mostly remain humans.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I know what you want to believe but have a look at facts.
>>>
>>> “Ninety-five percent of mass shootings are committed by men,” says
Fox, a
>>> research professor of criminology, law and public policy at Northeastern.
“The
>>> overall majority of violent crimes — particularly homicide and gun
homicide —
>>> are committed by men.”
>>>
>>> https://news.northeastern.edu/2024/12/17/mass-shootings-by-w
men-wisconsin-school/
>>>
>>> And:
>>>
>>> Women commit a small fraction of homicides and murders compared to men,
>>> accounting for roughly 10-13% of all homicide offenders. Female-perpetrated
>>> mass murder is even rarer, representing only about 5-6% of cases. Men are
>>> responsible for approximately 90% of all homicide cases worldwide, with
>>> significantly higher rates of violence.
>>>>
>>
>> it's worth noting the domestic violence percentages rank in this order:
>>
>> lesbian couples > straight couples > gay men couples
>
> Source?
>>
>> imo women are more likely to start violence,
>
> and how would you describe that they do that....nagging?....saying
> no?..........
and after the actual violence: "she pushed my buttons"
>
>
>> it's just men are more
>> committed to the violence when they actually do start
>>
>> same for suicides:
>>
>> a woman is more likely to attempt suicide
>>
>> and man is more likely to actually suicide
>
> this is true. Why is another matter.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
